ChipMcDonald · @chipmcdonald
236 followers · 414 posts · Server lor.sh

I'm just going to throw this out there...

I see that Michael Osterholm has suddenly decided to take a position of is mild.

He's actually suggesting it's "a cold" and looks forward to when everybody gets it twice a year, because it's so mild.

Which is insane. I'd suggest it's also a tell for sociopathy.

Because he knows is real, that there isn't a "mild" infection when it's wrecking your immune system, damaging organs.

Which leads to another point.

I just remembered, long ago in my more "conspiracy" minded days, I went on a tear reading obscure news, science articles from the 1920s-30s, pre WWII.

I initially was interested in seeing for myself the extent of the relationship to the Nazis of the Bush family, but it led me on a tangent into eugenics.

I'm going to make the unsubstantiated claim that:

1) eugenics was an open, and popular topic among science circles at this time and

2) much of the public face of eugenics has been expunged.

Combined with my "funny" theory that make up a much larger portion of the population than we're led to believe, I'm going to suggest that "let it rip" , , and other blatant positions that ignore the impact of on the , , are in fact -

a sociopath group-mind think regarding the "pragmatic" advantages to an era of "natural eugenics".

If this were 1928, I believe the tone these scientists take would be more blatant, and telling. There is no reason not to think that the same attitude among the sociopaths/NPD population isn't occurring now - except they have to be more surreptitious about it.

*These scenarios, these positions, are not "accidents", or "ignorance"*.

When an epidemiologist ignores the health implications of a pandemic, he knows exactly what he's saying. As does a virologist that insist that people don't need to wear a mask, etc. etc.

They're voluntarily participating in lite. To their perspective it's simply logical: only the infirm will be eliminated, and it's harmful to the economy to try to rectify that - and eventually the breed will be stronger.

I wish I didn't think this; but you've got to consider the cognitive dissonance you experience when this cadre of covid says things that are contradictory to what they've previously said.

The sociopath *does not care*. The Narcissist *does not care* if you find them to be lying. It makes no difference to them. That doesn't mean they're not *reasoning*; but reason without empathy and humane consideration leads to eugenics.

I hope I'm being hyperbolic in my jadedness. But I think we need to be more jaded in this respect, and that these people need to be regarded as neo .

/ Frakking frak, I'm just a guitar teacher that wants to get back to just having my head in the clouds about music and art. This is stifling. Maybe I'm being too negative....?

// $.10

#greatbarringtondeclaration #gbd #letitrip #covid #LongCovid #sociopaths #poors #elderly #comorbid #eugenics #minimizers #eugenicists

Last updated 2 years ago

Dr Gryndil · @Gryndil
13 followers · 354 posts · Server universeodon.com

RT @gorskon@twitter.com

There’s a reason that Merriam-Webster-Webster chose “gaslighting” -s the word of the year. There’s no one better at gaslighting their early pandemic pronouncements than contrarians like signatories like @DrJBhattacharya@twitter.com. twitter.com/jamessurowiecki/st

#covid19 #greatbarringtondeclaration

Last updated 2 years ago

#AxisOfEasy · @axisofeasy
32 followers · 621 posts · Server nojack.easydns.ca
#AxisOfEasy · @axisofeasy
32 followers · 621 posts · Server nojack.easydns.ca