Everyone constructively critiquing/destructively criticizing christianity and/or christofascism,

whether any kind of christian, ex-christian, or neither

is needed and can add something to the conversation,

though I also award personal bonus points to those who preface those critiques with specific language like "evangelical", "conservative", "liberal", "reactionary", and "fundamentalist".

This isn't a #notallchristians thing- as a christian I'm quite #yesallchristians about the problems most anarchists diagnose in christianity that are rooted in liberalism, yt supremacy culture, cisheteropatriarchy, colonialism, exploitation, and domination (and a lot of which originated from the Imperial Church or sprung up in tandem with it over the millennia in a chicken-and-egg sort of deal)

it's just a nerdy thing- and I'm very much for democratizing information about religious history and political theology

because for deconstructers like myself this shit goes so deep. And having that language can be really liberating. I can speak from experience on finding value in the term "purity culture" for example.

And just like how for white ppl today the whiteness deconstruction process is an ongoing thing,

religious trauma and the teachings of domination are really deeply embedded in those of us raised in the sociological entity called the church.

I'll do another post sometime about my thoughts on church,

but suffice it to say for now that I'm not necessarily against organized religion, but always want to ask *how* a religion is organized. Because articulation of mutually edifying relationships in a spiritual community is good, and domination is cancer.
:anarchoheart2: :anarchoheart2: :anarchoheart2: