@pixelcode My suggestion is to take inspiration from the gemini web. Gemini gives back the control of development through gutting the features. This means one needs only one developer to create a browser.

The hypertext web is too bloated because its features are eternally expanding. This demands excessive amounts of resources to keep up with.

We have two options. Embrace the gemini web, or create a new protocol.

The solution to control over development is #lightweight and #𐑳𐑯𐑗𐑱𐑯𐑛.

#𐑡𐑧𐑥𐑦𐑯𐑲

@bitzero It also ignores how we have lost control over the hypertext web through letting it be more and more feature rich.

This means that only a few actors are able to keep up with the features. Safari, Chromium and Firefox.

Google is also proposing Manifest v. 3 which may take away our right to privacy.

With Gemini, we are in control over development, because one person is all that is needed to develop a functional browser.

#lightweight #𐑤𐑲𐑑𐑢𐑱𐑑
#OurTools #𐑬𐑼𐑑𐑵𐑤𐑟
#foss #𐑳𐑯𐑗𐑱𐑯𐑛

Free/unchained software/tools has four requirements. The freedom to:

1. share to help others.
2. understand the tool.
3. perform as we want.
4. adapt to our needs.

When tools becomes too bloated, we loose the ability to understand them, therefore we dont know whether the tool performs as we want. It also means reducing the adaptability of the tool.

Therefore, I dont concider bloated "free/unchained" tools to be truely unchained.

#𐑑𐑵𐑤𐑟 #𐑤𐑲𐑑𐑢𐑱𐑑 #𐑳𐑯𐑗𐑱𐑯𐑛
#tools #lightweight #foss

Free/unchained software/tools has four requirements. The freedom to:

1. share, so that the tool can help others.
2. understand the tool.
3. perform as we want.
4. adapt to our needs.

When tools becomes too bloated, we loose the ability to understand them, therefore we dont know whether the tool performs as we want. It also means reducing the adaptability of the tool.

Therefore, I dont concider bloated "free/unchained" tools to be truely unchained.

#𐑑𐑵𐑤𐑟 #𐑤𐑲𐑑𐑢𐑱𐑑 #𐑳𐑯𐑗𐑱𐑯𐑛
#lightweight #foss