The Texas Observer reports on Tx Dep't of Agriculture's new dress code: ”Employees are expected to comply with this dress code in a manner consistent with their biological gender" [sic] & will face "corrective action" if they don't.

This is literally what the Supreme Court held violated Title VII in #Bostock. In 2020! In a Gorsuch opinion! I know the #RuleofLaw is in tatters, but seriously . . .
https://www.texasobserver.org/sid-miller-department-agriculture-dress-code-transgender/
@TexasObserver @oconnell #transphobia #LGBTQIA+ #Texas #SCOTUS #trans

11th Circuit created a circuit split in #trans #BathroomBill case - the en banc decision in Adams v. School Bd. of St. Jones Cnty. case ruled the law was constitutional.

This is a direct conflict with several circuits, including 4th (Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. School Bd.) and 7th (Whitaker ex rel. Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School Dist.) and likely conflicts with #SCOTUS ruling in #Bostock. Expect a Supreme Court ruling next year.

As someone who admittedly doesn't know nearly as much about #trans life in #Pakistan as she would like to, it's striking to see where the two countries are now when you realize Pakistan's #Transgender Persons Protection of Rights Act and #Bostock occurred in the same year (2020).

Would love to connect with anyone in Pakistan who can give more context to this; I'd be deeply grateful. I'm having trouble with the way this is written for some reason— "rehabilitation" is really throwing me off (see 2nd image).
🔗 https://www.dawn.com/news/1726234