Interesting blog post with illustrative example of how #WebOfScience #Dimensions #Scopus and #Crossref capture the #acknowledgments in a research paper https://www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/acknowledging-the-difficulties-a-case-study-of-a-funding-text
#WebofScience #dimensions #scopus #Crossref #acknowledgments
@astrojuanlu @mattkram @joss It is a lot of work and time that is needed to get in the indexes.
Technically they could (see the referenced paper below).
They have a #DOI and #crossref, which seems to be sufficient.
Fun fact: They wrote in PeerJ about their first year (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32704456/), which is available via PubMed.
Of course, all of the journal's systems are open source. E.g., the publishing pipeline is available here:
https://github.com/openjournals/inara
The pipeline currently produces #PDF, #JATS, and #Crossref XML output.
#joss
#Vergabe von #DOI (#Digital #Online #Identifier) über #Crossref: #Mitgliedschaft ab $275 pro Jahr, #abhängig von #Umsatz. #Zusätzlich(e) #Kosten pro #Veröffentlichung; #Voraussetzung: #Statuten #erfüllen.
#Verlag #Wissenschaftsverlag #Werkhueter #Professionalitätsmagie #Wissenschaft
#Vergabe #doi #digital #online #identifier #Crossref #Mitgliedschaft #abhängig #umsatz #Zusätzlich #kosten #Veröffentlichung #voraussetzung #Statuten #erfüllen #verlag #Wissenschaftsverlag #werkhueter #professionalitätsmagie #wissenschaft