@khinsen @jonny @devnull @daviwil @Mehrad @bonfire @nodebb
Yes. But that's part of it, and still a technical perspective. Follow-up Q is: Who's creating, maintaining, evolving the protocols, formats and data models?
At least when considering protocols focus is on ecosystem level. But to make the ecosystem healthy it needs a "substrate" of people, processes, organization structure that maintain it.
#SocialCoding considers the #FSDL: Free Software Development Lifecycle
@adamgreenfield another Btw..
Re: Big Industry vs. Grassroots #FOSS I posted to Social Coding Movement:
Though topic isn't elaborated much, #SocialCoding adopts a holistic view on the entire Free Software Development Lifecycle, the #FSDL. Which then includes the question "How can fragmented small initiatives find cohesion and thrive in a sustainable ecosystem?"
Observation is that the ecosystem must be healthy, so it can evolve. And 'Ecosystem focus' is often absent.
Btw, I took notes on fedi's challenges here: https://discuss.coding.social/t/major-challenges-for-the-fediverse/67
In Social Coding Movement the objective is to focus on all those aspects that go beyond cranking out code. To consider the entire Free Software Development Lifecycle (#FSDL) and how it can be supported ideally by federated technology.
@RyunoKi @kirschner @fsfe @forgefriends
#REUSE was discussed on our #SocialCoding channels the other day, and folks having real good experiences. I intend to use the tools and #SPDX specs myself.
There is a forum topic on this: https://discuss.coding.social/t/software-transparency-software-bill-of-materials-sbom-and-spdx/104
And a best-practice template + discussion for REUSE to be included in the https://coding.social pattern library.
https://discuss.coding.social/t/licensing-reuse-conformance/87
Licensing is important part of the Free Software Development Lifecycle (#FSDL).
#FSDL #spdx #socialcoding #reuse