One thing I'm having trouble with in my #PLDev project is scoped vs. unscoped blocks.
For instance, normally if you have variables inside of a { } block, they're scoped to that block (when the block ends they no longer exist).
However, I have need of an UNSCOPED block, mainly for compile-time conditions.
In C/C++, these conditions are usually written as
but I don't actually have a preprocessor so it'd be nice to have something closer to the rest of the language. something like:
if const(foo)
#{
// do something only if foo is true at compile time
}#
the only problem is I don't love the #{ }# bracing that I have there - but I haven't come up with anything better.
[] and () are already widely used, <> is a parsing nightmare (since they're other operators), I don't really want to use : since it's also widely in use
Has anyone seen a language that has distinct scoped and unscoped blocks? What did that look like?
Interessanter Text zum #Fastenbrechen. Sehr lesenswert.
#Fasten #Heilfasten #IF #IntermittierendesFasten #OMAD #OMEOD
#Fastenbrechen #Fasten #Heilfasten #IF #IntermittierendesFasten #OMAD #OMEOD
Neuberechnung der Macros:
Carbs: 4 % (15 Gramm)
Protein: 22 % (90 Gramm)
Fat: 74 % (135 Gramm)
Keto Ratio: 3:1
Woodyatt Ratio: 2,02
#BingeEating #Essstörung #Zuckerfrei #NoSugar #IF #IntermittierendesFasten #OMAD #Keto #ADF
:gruppe: @keto_gruppe
#BingeEating #Essstörung #Zuckerfrei #NoSugar #IF #IntermittierendesFasten #OMAD #Keto #ADF
Mein Ziel war, bis Mitte Juni eine Abnahme von 150 kg. #Depression & damit verbundene #BingeEating Phasen erlaubten das leider nicht.
Nun hoffe ich, dass ich noch die 100 kg Abnahme knacken kann bis dahin. Die Fressphase seit Ostern wirds schwer machen.
#Essstörung #Zuckerentzug #IF #IntermittierendesFasten #OMAD #Keto #ADF
:gruppe: @keto_gruppe
:gruppe: @fasten_gruppe
#Depression #BingeEating #Essstörung #Zuckerentzug #IF #IntermittierendesFasten #OMAD #Keto #ADF