**jshelter**

#firefox #extension #noscript #jshelter #ublock #umatrix

NoScript блокирует загрузку отдельных скриптов или объектов. Всё то же самое умеют делать uBlock и uMatrix.

Дополнительно нужна защита от XSS, CSRF, позволяющая гибко настраивать правила, как в правилах файрвола. Помогает от всяких банков, которые любят прозванивать порты на 127.0.0.1

https://addons.mozilla.org/ru/firefox/addon/javascript-restrictor/

JShelter же блокирует/перехватывает доступ к конкретным API вызовам и либо блокирует либо подменяет на фейковые данные по гибким настройкам.
С помощью JShelter гораздо проще сломать сайт и не понять почему, но позволяет подменить трекинговые вызовы API, что не может сделать NoScript.

Достаточно зайти на сайт измерения фингерпринта (https://polcak.github.io/jsrestrictor/test/test.html) с NoScript и JShelter и увидеть, что JShelter значительно понижает уникальность, а NoScript лишь блокирует рекламные скрипты.

FAQ (https://jshelter.org/faq/)
blog (https://jshelter.org/blog/)

JShelter0.14 is out now! You should see speed improvements from switching some shields to WebAssembly and we now have a Czech translation! When you are browsing you need extra protection. The #JShelter extension should be part of that protection. https://jshelter.org/versions/#0.14

It is really annoying that when you browse sites with #tor, those managed with #cloudflare pretty frequently demand you to enable JavaScript and disable #jshelter, and then require you to click an area similar to recaptcha for confirmation that you are human.

Site owners using Cloudflare, please allow TOR connections explicitly on the dashboard, unless your sites are under consistent DDOS attack!

Did you know that malicious web sites can identify you through fingerprinting or use other tactics for tracking your activity? #JShelter aims to improve the privacy and security of your Web browsing. #FreeJS https://u.fsf.org/3gc

@lproven @anomalocaris
Unfortunately that archive site is helping Goo train AI systems, so we cannot use that either.

Your valient efforts are duly noted.

Its cool, we always encourage #TorBrowser and other forks of Mozilla's. Never not #BraveBrowser. Resources like spyware.i2p show problems with Brave. Its unfortunate that #JShelter opt for Brave's anti-fingerprinting measures, which sound inconsistent.

Did you know that malicious web sites can identify you through fingerprinting or use other tactics for tracking your activity? #JShelter aims to improve the privacy and security of your Web browsing. #FreeJS https://u.fsf.org/3gc

Did you know that malicious Web sites can identify you through fingerprinting or use other tactics for tracking your activity? #JShelter aims to improve the privacy and security of your Web browsing. #FreeJS https://u.fsf.org/3gc

Read a new interview with #JShelter developers from the most recent FSF bulletin: https://www.fsf.org/bulletin/2023/spring/freedom-and-privacy-on-the-web-our-interview-with-the-jshelter-team

Did you know that malicious Web sites can identify you through fingerprinting or use other tactics for tracking your activity? #JShelter aims to improve the privacy and security of your Web browsing. #FreeJS https://u.fsf.org/3gc

@sadiedoreen
We will need to take a squiz (look) when we can. Cheers!

BTW we are looking for a browser addon that imitates TorBrowser in terms of and Safer and Safest settings for javascript functions.

We looked into #jShelter during the week but they seem to be going for a technique of reducing fingerprinting called Farbling. It sounds inconsistent and so we don't like it as an option.

If something springs to mind, feel free to tell.

So #jShelter seems to break with #TorBrowser's way of removing potentially harmful #javascript, prefering what seems a more random and experimental method, #Farbling that says it produces inconsistent behaviours. Is that not worse than a broken page that Tor produces occasionally?

Is there an addon that seeks to imitate TorBrowser's method of providing a safer js?

It will likely be beneficial for those who don't use TorBrowser but still want safer javascript.

Did you know that malicious Web sites can identify you through fingerprinting or use other tactics for tracking your activity? #JShelter aims to improve the privacy and security of your Web browsing. #FreeJS https://u.fsf.org/3gc

Navegación más segura

Interesante extensión #JShelter Comparte desarrolladores con #NoScript (que es la que usaba) pero trae un modo por defecto para minimizar los problemas de funcionamiento de la webs y así desentenderse de la tediosa configuración de permisos en NoScript.

https://jshelter.org/

JShelter 0.12.2 is out now! When you are browsing you need extra protection. The #JShelter extension should be part of that protection. https://jshelter.org/versions/#0.12.2

Hmm. Do I need #uBlock Origin, #PrivacyBadger, *and* #JShelter in #Firefox? I'm guessing I can probably dump Privacy Badger? EFF says it's still useful even with FF's tracking protection set to "strict", but what value is it actually adding?

Did you know that malicious Web sites can identify you through fingerprinting or use other tactics for tracking your activity? #JShelter aims to improve the privacy and security of your Web browsing. #FreeJS https://u.fsf.org/3gc

#JShelter seems to break CloudFlare's "are you a human" check. I could either turn off JavaScript Shield or just not visit those sites. I think I'll just not visit those sites.

你是否被浏览器指纹、追踪、数据收集等恶意 JS 所困扰？#JShelter 可以祝你一臂之力！https://jshelter.org/

你是否被浏览器指纹、追踪、数据收集等恶意 JS 所困扰？#JShelter 可以祝你一臂之力！https://jshelter.org/

Did you know that malicious Web sites can identify you through fingerprinting or use other tactics for tracking your activity? #JShelter aims to improve the privacy and security of your Web browsing. #FreeJS https://u.fsf.org/3gc