@kaia isn't that an #MCST #Elbrus board?

@ted_dunning @profoundlynerdy @Houl the only.asvantage is that #SPARCv9 & #POWER9 are #FLOSS'd like #RISCV so the limiting factor would be economies of scale and the ability to procure fabbing, which sadly isn't #FLOSS'd yet ( #LibreSilicon works on that!)...

This literally bit #Russia in the rear as #TSMC canceled any deliveries for #MCST's chips they fabbed on 28nm nodes...

@malwaretech This is worse than the shit #MCST is spitting out...

they are at least aware that their tech is reused 28nn TSMC with #SparcV9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MCST

@niconiconi hey, the #GDR did attempt to make good money, but due to #CoCom aka. #Cyberfacism with #Embargos of #Technology and their de-facto nonexisting liquidity, maximum output of 1Mbit chips was propagandized at a number lower than a early monday shift at Toshiba at the same era...

Not to mention like #Russia's #MCST the tech used is several generations older than "state of the art"...

https://www.mdr.de/geschichte/ddr/wirtschaft/ein-megabit-speicher-carl-zeiss-jena-100.html