@ZoomHistoire
> et, plus récemment, ceux de spécialistes d’#histoire sociale:
> #MarkTauger dont la plupart des articles et ouvrages sont téléchargeables
> et R.W. #Davies and S.G. #Wheatcroft, The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture, 1931-1933,
> New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2004
> (travaux catégoriques sur le caractère non volontaire et non génocidaire de la famine ou grave disette,
> non limitée à l’#Ukraine, qu’a connue une partie de l’#UnionSoviétique en 1932-1933)
https://www.historiographie.info/ukr33maj2008.pdf
#unionsoviétique #ukraine #Wheatcroft #davies #MarkTauger #histoire
#USA historian #MarkTauger (1991)
> The data presented here provide a more precise measure of the consequences of #collectivization and forced #industrialization […]; [they] show that the effects of those policies were worse than has been assumed.
> They also, however, indicate that the famine was real, the result of a failure of economic policy […] rather than a "successful" nationality policy against Ukrainians or other ethnic groups.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120426111245/http://www.as.wvu.edu/history/Faculty/Tauger/Tauger,%20%27The%201932%20Harvest%20and%20the%20Famine%20of%201933,%20SR%2091.pdf
@rysiek
#industrialization #collectivization #MarkTauger #usa
@ZoomHistoire
eh ben je sais pas en #France, mais en lisant un peu plus d'historiens anglo-saxons je croise de sérieuses critiques des travaux de #NicolasWerth sur l'#Ukraine de 1933 :
> In particular, Werth
asserts that #Molotov rejected local officials' appeals for reduced quotas (183) : according to the archives and Werth's sources, Molotov did authorize reductions. [8]
Vu sur la page de l'historien étasunien #MarkTauger : https://web.archive.org/web/20120206205919/http://history.wvu.edu/faculty_staff/current_faculty/dr_mark_tauger/soviet_articles
#MarkTauger #molotov #ukraine #NicolasWerth #france