The New York Times RSS · @nytimesrss
5 followers · 88 posts · Server 0twitter.com

"Finally, the amendment adds language ensuring that churches, universities, and other religious organizations would not lose tax-exempt status or other benefits for refusing to recognize same-sex marriages and would not be required to provide services for the celebration of any marriage."
Yes, but what about for-profit organizations such as ? This bill is clearly setting up for them to be legally required to either violate their consciences or close. Not cool, . Not cool at all. ncregister.com/cna/senate-adva

#nonprofit #MasterpieceCakeshop #senate #RFMA #LegislatingMorality #AttackOnConscienceProtection

Last updated 2 years ago

"Finally, the amendment adds language ensuring that churches, universities, and other religious organizations would not lose tax-exempt status or other benefits for refusing to recognize same-sex marriages and would not be required to provide services for the celebration of any marriage."
Yes, but what about for-profit organizations such as ? This bill is clearly setting up for them to be legally required to either violate their consciences or close. Not cool, . Not cool at all. ncregister.com/cna/senate-adva

#nonprofit #MasterpieceCakeshop #senate #RFMA #LegislatingMorality #AttackOnConscienceProtection

Last updated 2 years ago

"Finally, the amendment adds language ensuring that churches, universities, and other religious organizations would not lose tax-exempt status or other benefits for refusing to recognize same-sex marriages and would not be required to provide services for the celebration of any marriage."
Yes, but what about for-profit organizations such as ? This bill is clearly setting up for them to be legally required to either violate their consciences or close. Not cool, . Not cool at all. ncregister.com/cna/senate-adva

#nonprofit #MasterpieceCakeshop #senate #RFMA #LegislatingMorality #AttackOnConscienceProtection

Last updated 2 years ago