#GitmoLowlands: Robert Jensen is totally done with Maurice 'The Dog' who now seems to recommend 1 meter distancing. His story of #aerosols only helped the government in maintaining their draconian measures.
I would like #NoAgenda to finally grasp that the essence still is: #NoTestNoVirus. There is no reliable diagnostic test for #COVID19. Without that, you have nothing to base policy on. 🔬 #PCR

@nostradamust #NoTestNoVirus This should be repeated again and again on The Show, in stead of the 'spread of the virus' narrative.

@MartinJJ @hogihung
I wonder if they ever isolated 'the virus'. If they didn't, then that explains why they're using different parts of the genetic sequence and why it is claimed that it testst for ALL corona. Keep in mind that vaccinations also contain corona, at times. For humans and other cattle. Hence the 'incidence' of corona in slaughterhouses.
If you test for antigens, you still need to know against what these work. That means isolation. 🔬 #RTPCR #NoTestNoVirus

And although it is still true, I meant to state that there is no quantative test for COVID19. To establish who 'has it' you need to establish the viral load. The RT-PCR is not suitable. Why? With this procedure you duplicate what you have in your sample. You do that to see WHAT you have in your sample. It matters a lot how much you start with and how much you amplify or duplicate the sample. There's a stated maximum of approx. 35 cycles. 🔬 #NoTestNoVirus #RTPCR

It's also been reported that water samples from sewers tested positive, test samples from one year ago. You want to claim that 'the virus' was already present at that time? Or do you finally see that there is no reliable, qualitative test for 'the virus'?
I've spent some time to explain all this to @adam in an email. He thanked me. If only he would read it…
🔬 #RTPCR #NoTestNoVirus
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-spain-science-idUSKBN23X2HQ

Tanzania's president Magafuli is said to have studied chemistry. So he had non-humans tested too, unknown to his lab. The goat and paw paw fruit (papaya?) came out positive. 🔬 #RTPCR #NoTestNoVirus
https://youtu.be/s4p8DM8rKJI

This may be because there is no standard for testing on COVID19. Every country has its own part of the genetic sequence they look at. 🔬 #RTPCR #NoTestNoVirus
https://youtu.be/C1t3SoR8fwg

RT-PCR is suitable to establish which virus you're dealing with. But they're not even doing that. It's been reported that the test procedure is non-specific and gives the result for ANY corona virus present. 🔬
#RTPCR #NoTestNoVirus
https://youtu.be/5I46oFxp5L0?t=3523

The Chinese have determined both the false negative and false positive that the RT-PCR produces. They both prove these tests are useless for establishing if someone is infected or was killed by 'the virus'.
#NoTestNoVirus
https://youtu.be/Jvy6C5c9xTw?t=185
and
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32133832/

Let me repeat 📣
𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗𝟭𝟵.
That means that much of the discussion about the spread of 'the virus' is pointless exercise in complex theory, e.g. about aerosols.
The used RT-PCR test was never developed for this use. It is for a qualitative test, to find out what the genetic make up looks like. Not how much of it you have. The inventor, Kary Mullis was clear about that. 🔬 #RTPCR #NoTestNoVirus