A new #preprint #OpenScience #PeerReview by @PCI_Ecology: Yuval R. Zelnik, Matthieu Barbier, David W. Shanafelt, Michel Loreau, Rachel M. Germain (2023) Linking intrinsic scales of ecological processes to characteristic scales of biodiversity and functioning patterns. bioRxiv, ver. 2 peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community in Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.11.463913 🔽

Are you a current graduate student in library or information science? Want to learn how peer review works in a supportive environment?

We are OPEN TO SUBMISSIONS all year 'round, and we'll work with you to Polish your writing to a shine!

#PeerReview #submissionsopen #Journal #MLIS #InformationScience #Libraries #Library #Student

when you open the reviewer report for a paper and find out you were reviewer 2... #ImTheProblemItsMe #PeerReview

A new #preprint #OpenScience #PeerReview by @PCI_AnimSci: Gebhardt-Henrich et al. (2023) Validation of a Radio frequency identification system for tracking location of laying hens in a quasi-commercial aviary system.https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.16.528820 recommended by Anna Olsson for @PCI_AnimSci based on published reviews by Mona Giersberg and Arjen van Putten #OpenScience https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.animsci.100193

A new #preprint #OpenScience #PeerReview by @PCI_AnimSci: Gebhardt-Henrich et al. (2023) Validation of a Radio frequency identification system for tracking location of laying hens in a quasi-commercial aviary system.https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.16.528820 recommended by Anna Olsson for @PCI_AnimSci based on published reviews by Mona Giersberg and Arjen van Putten #OpenScience https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.animsci.100193

New study: "The Journal Impact Factor [#JIF] is a bad predictor of the #quality of #PeerReview of an individual manuscript."
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3002238

Related from last year (August 2022): JIF is a bad predictor of article-level citations and "should not be used to measure the quality of individual articles."
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01455613221119051

Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review | Research Integrity and Peer Review https://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5 #AI #education #PeerReview

De camino a Cuenca para el curso de verano de @UIMP «Pilares para el avance de la ciencia abierta».

Voy a hablar de inovación en #peerreview y pienso romper el hielo preguntando:

👉 ¿Para qué sirve la revisión por pares? 🤨

¿Qué pensáis?

@UIMPCuenca @CSICdivulga

#UniversalBasicIncome #UBI seems to work according to new #peerreview #research released by PNAS.

“The recipients of the cash transfers did not increase spending on drugs, tobacco, and alcohol, but did increase spending on food, clothes, and rent, according to self-reports. What’s more, they moved into stable housing faster and saved enough money to maintain financial security over the year of follow-up.”

Let's means-test less and give aid and #kindness more.

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21528569/homeless-poverty-cash-transfer-canada-new-leaf-project

Sciety now makes it even easier to discover communities reviewing and curating preprints by showing you related groups in your search results. #Preprints #PeerReview

A new #preprint #OpenScience #PeerReview by @PCI_Ecology: Matthieu Paquet, Frederic Barraquand (2023) Assessing species interactions using integrated #predatorprey models. EcoEvoRxiv, ver. 2 peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community in Ecology. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2RC7W

A new #preprint #OpenScience #PeerReview by @PCI_Microbiol: Olivier Rué, Monika Coton, Eric Dugat-Bony, Kate Howell, Françoise Irlinger, Jean-Luc Legras, Valentin Loux, Elisa Michel, Jérôme Mounier, Cécile Neuvéglise, Delphine Sicard (2023) Comparison of metabarcoding taxonomic markers to describe fungal communities in fermented foods. bioRxiv, ver. 3 peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.13.523754 🔽

Are you a graduate student working in Library Science or a related Information Science field?

We want to help you learn what it's like to be peer-reviewed!

Submit your research article, evidence summary, or book review to us today! https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/ischoolsrj/

More than an ordinary journal process, the SRJs mission includes helping new researchers improve their skills and become comfortable with the peer-review process. We provide detailed feedback over multiple editing revisions to help you polish your work into its best possible version!

#Research #Articles #ILS #LS #Library #Libraries #LibraryScience #Information #InformationScience #MARA #MLIS #GraduateStudent #College #PeerReview #Journal #Submissions #SubmissionsOpen #Science #Librarian #Librarians #SanJose #University #Learning #Editing

A very interesting piece of work. And unsurprisingly in #academia "praise" in #PeerReview was low across the board! 😔 #academicchatter @academicchatter @PLOSBiology
https://fediscience.org/@PLOSBiology/110977783404725065

@PLOSBiology Interesting: "In conclusion, peer review in journals with higher impact factors tends to be more thorough, particularly in addressing study methods while giving relatively less emphasis to presentation or suggesting solutions. Differences were modest and variability high, indicating that the Journal Impact Factor is a bad predictor of the quality of peer review of an individual manuscript." #PeerReview

My recent #preprint (https://biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.01.27.525839v3) has been #recommended by @PeerCommunityIn Ecology 🥳🥳🥳
https://ecology.peercommunityin.org/articles/rec?id=527

Doing a single-author study was challenging but also a very interesting experience.
Thanks a lot to the recommender and reviewers! #OpenScience #PeerReview

A new #preprint #OpenScience #PeerReview by @PCI_Ecology: Michael Raatz (2023) Provision of essential resources as a persistence strategy in #foodwebs. #bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.27.525839

A new #preprint #OpenScience #PeerReview by @PCI_Ecology: Logan CJ, McCune KB, LeGrande-Rolls C, Marfori Z, Hubbard J, Lukas D (2023) Implementing a rapid geographic range expansion - the role of behavior changes. EcoEvoRxiv, ver. 3 peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community in Ecology. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2N30J 🔽

I missed this #Elsevier pilot project with #OpenPeerReview in 2019.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-08250-2

"Publishing [#PeerReview] reports did not significantly compromise referees’ willingness to review, recommendations, or turn-around times. Younger and non-academic scholars were more willing to…review & provided more positive & objective recommendations. Male referees tended to write more constructive reports…Only 8.1% of referees agreed to reveal their identity in the published report."

A new #preprint #OpenScience #PeerReview by @PCI_AnimSci: Birte L. Nielsen, Huw D.R. Golledge, Jen-Yun Chou, Irene Camerlink, Péter Pongrácz, Maria Camila Ceballos, Alexandra L. Whittaker and I. Anna S. Olsson (2023) Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution?. OSF preprints, ver. 3 peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community in Animal Science. https://www.doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/s6459 recommended by Hervé Acloque for @PCI_AnimSci based on… 🔽