Jonn · @jonn
354 followers · 5361 posts · Server social.doma.dev

No matter how silly @nasimtaleb is in his understanding of science and statistics, some of his takes are ok. Reading "the great thinking models" which spares me from reading his ramblings. His is basically what is all about and what I mention in my talk: youtu.be/uTF2sUJKR3o

#elixir #Uptight #erlang #antifragility

Last updated 2 years ago

Jonn · @jonn
308 followers · 4390 posts · Server social.doma.dev

@derekkraan funny, i made a vc-based author library which is very easy to set up to use instead of monstrosities like . I wouldn't mind getting cash from people asking me to develop it beyond what it is for my use case. Same with , which, I feel is closing a huge gap in reliability.
But I don't want to forsake hex.pm. Neither do I care about "infra outages". Libraries are called like this because they just are, full of functions, as opposed to applications.

#elixir #Uptight #keycloak

Last updated 3 years ago

Jonn · @jonn
227 followers · 3378 posts · Server social.doma.dev

Even though I fixed semantic mess of by publishing the library github.com/doma-engineering/up, I still need to interact with non-tightly-typed code sometimes.

Sometimes, just unwrapping isn't enough or isn't ergonomic, so then I have to go back to operating with raw binaries.

While typing those, as anyone should, I feel bad when I write `binary` and I also feel bad when I write `String.t()`. Again, as anyone should.

After thinking about this issue for so long, I finally understood that in , both of those types should be called `uninterpreted_binary()` or `blob()`. I know it will never happen, but `String.t()` has to be deprecated.

The reason not to use `binary()` type in Elixir is clear. When binaries are *interpreted* as Strings, there's a whole lot of semantics going on, and this interpretation is way more pushed than in . But it still happens at interpretation time, it has nothing to do with the type of an term presented. This is the reason not to use `String.t()`. So yeah, the most correct way to put it is `blob()`: an uninterpreted raw binary, that is, however, easily and automatically gets interpreted as strings.

As a matter of fact, `String.t()` may just be the Elixir's hundred thousand dollar mistake.

#erlang #elixir #Uptight #elixirlang

Last updated 3 years ago

Jonn · @jonn
150 followers · 2931 posts · Server social.doma.dev

New video where I showcase , an amazing tool for digital archeology.

It's slow-paced, but I show what I'm doing, and how I'm working around slight bugs of the tool.

I also put it to a practical use while working on , one of many. Enjoy!

tubedu.org/w/sHZ96azBqFZGAxk1S

#Uptight #gittemporal

Last updated 3 years ago

Jonn · @jonn
150 followers · 2931 posts · Server social.doma.dev

Plucking Assertions out of for ultimate programming experience with library.

#Uptight #elixir #ExUnit

Last updated 3 years ago