Two comments:

1. On the one hand, I have doubts about the finding of gender parity in journal acceptances. See my long (and still-growing) Twitter thread of evidence for gender bias in academic publishing.
https://twitter.com/petersuber/status/1252981139855355904

2. On the other hand, these authors seem to have done a thorough literature review. Moreover, this study is what Daniel Kahneman called an #AdversarialCollaboration, a model I admire and see too rarely in practice.

Break the endless cycle of critique → reply → rejoinder by embracing adversarial collaboration, a method to solve problems more quickly and transparently.

#AdversarialCollaboration #Paradox #paradoxpairs

https://www.paradoxpairs.com/adversarial-collaboration/

#Income and #emotional #wellbeing: a #conflict resolved

#OpenAccess
#AdversarialCollaboration

"In a joint #reanalysis of the experience sampling data, the flattening pattern exists but is restricted to the 20% least happy, while complementary nonlinearities contribute to the overall linear-log relationship between happiness and income. The discrepant results are due to the authors’ reliance on standard practices and assumptions of data analysis in social science"

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2208661120