#ZerothLawOfSemiotics • Discussion 4.1
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2022/12/25/zeroth-law-of-semiotics-discussion-4/
<ET:>
Well the truth value can me true or false or something else — akin to \(5+5=12\) being a true statement, if one knows what base it involves, else it may be false. The same for \(4+4=10\) being a true statement, if one knows what base it involves.
</ET>
Yes, reference is relative to a frame of reference. In pragmatic #Semiotics, frames of reference are called #SignRelations.
#Logic #Peirce #Semeiotics #AllLiarNoParadox
2/2
#allliarnoparadox #semeiotics #Peirce #logic #SignRelations #semiotics #ZerothLawOfSemiotics
#ZerothLawOfSemiotics • Discussion 4
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2022/12/25/zeroth-law-of-semiotics-discussion-4/
Re: FB | Pattern Languages for Systemic Transformation
• https://www.facebook.com/groups/125513674232534/posts/5698095106974335
Re: Esteban Trev
• https://www.facebook.com/groups/125513674232534/posts/5698095106974335?comment_id=5701465213303991
<QUOTE JA:>
A statement \(S_0\) asserts that a statement \(S_1\) is a statement that \(S_1\) is false.
The statement \(S_0\) violates an #Axiom of #Logic, so it doesn’t really matter whether the
ostensible statement \(S_1,\) the so-called “#Liar”, really is a statement or has a #TruthValue.
#allliarnoparadox #truthvalue #liar #logic #axiom #ZerothLawOfSemiotics
#ZerothLawOfSemiotics • Discussion 3
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2022/12/14/zeroth-law-of-semiotics-discussion-3/
1 | My remarks on Facebook regarding the Zeroth Law Of Semiotics and its application to the Liar Paradox prompted Kent Olson to observe, “The liar paradox is a self-referential paradox, yes? I think Russell answered these”. I added the following comment.
#Logic #Semeiotics #Semiotics #SignRelations
#Peirce #Epimenides #LiarParadox #AllLiarNoParadox
#allliarnoparadox #LiarParadox #Epimenides #Peirce #SignRelations #semiotics #semeiotics #logic #ZerothLawOfSemiotics
#AllLiarNoParadox
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/08/01/all-liar-no-paradox/
A statement \(S_0\) asserts that a statement \(S_1\) is a statement that \(S_1\) is false.
The statement \(S_0\) violates an #AxiomOfLogic, so it doesn’t really matter whether the #OstensibleStatement \(S_1,\) the so-called #Liar, really is a statement or has a #TruthValue.
#Logic #LogicalAxiom #LawOfLogic #LogicalGraph
#LiarParadox #Epimenides #EpimenidesParadox
#epimenidesparadox #Epimenides #LiarParadox #logicalgraph #lawoflogic #logicalaxiom #logic #truthvalue #liar #ostensiblestatement #axiomoflogic #allliarnoparadox