As you read, yesterday I was criticizing a recent paper about interpretation of #LeonardoDaVinci's drawings in #CodexArundel (1480-1518)
This interpretation, recreation of alleged #DaVinci's experiment and paper suggest that #DaVinci was able to understand what was called #gravity beyond ideas of DaVinci's epoch and especially before Galileo's experiments on falling bodies -1589-
I doubt it a lot but whole thing is spinning in my head yet and I think that writing is a way of ordering ideas

My page margin doodles were never this deep:

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/leonardo-da-vinci-gravity-2258459

#LeonardoDaVinci #CodexArundel #GravitationalConstant

In a uniformly accelerated motion if its initial velocity is u and its final velocity is v displacement is
S= 1/2 (u+v)t
That's mean speed theorem for such kinds of motions
On the left you have #DaVinci's drawings in #CodexArundel
and on the right the geometric constructions of Oresme -above- and Galileo -below- that prove the theorem of mean speed of #OxfordCalculators at #MertonCollege
Sorry Leonardo but #Galileo and #Newton hold

LoL What nonsense at NYTimes
#CodexArundel is a compilation of sheets written by #LeonardoDaVinci between 1480 and 1518
What u see in Leonardo's drawings is nothing more than #MertonCollege method created by #OxfordCalculators around 1350 to compute displacements from speeds in movements Characterized before by #AlbertOfSaxony or #NicoleOresme and referred to as "uniformiter difformis" by #DeSoto,an spaniard,which was how the uniformly accelerated movement was finally designated in #MiddleAges