@georgetakei
We could have a Supreme Court judicial ethics policy with teeth if Biden would just go ahead pack the court. It’s entirely within his power. Don’t think the Republicans will hesitate for a second to expand the court the moment they lose the majority and have the Presidency back in hand. They’ve already blocked Judicial nominations from Democrat presidents. They will go further.

The GOP’s promises mean absolutely nothing, as they have proven time and time again. Democrats have to learn that they can’t make deals with people who don’t act in good faith. Lucy isn’t going to leave that football on the ground, Charlie Brown!

The Democratic Party needs to stop using the terrible, corrupt, and horrifically damaging SC decisions for election fodder, and actually fix the problem. They have the power.

#PackTheCourt
#AppeasementNeverWorks
#CorruptSupremeCourt
#DemocratsAreComplicit
#SupremeCourtEthicsRefom

"​In 1978, the Maryland​ General Assembly enacted legislation creating the Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) Program to ensure that socially and economically disadvantaged small business owners are included in the state’s procurement and contracting opportunities. "

Will these programs that make a difference get challenged in court by a butt-hurt contractor without adequate MBE participation?

#AffirmativeAction #CorruptSupremeCourt #HorribleCourtDecisions

"Can't let those womenfolk and Blacks get too uppity, now." Alito, probably.

God, what a day.

#AffirmativeAction #BackToThe1900s #CorruptSupremeCourt #CrueltyIsThePoint

@ProPublica corrupt court and ongoing white patriarchy. #corruptsupremecourt

Next time Elon Musk's private jet takes off and he has an empty seat, I am going to demand that it be reserved for my ass.

Same thing with open first class and business class seats on commercial airliners. Nobody's using them--I guess I will.

Hey, it works for Sammy Alito.

#CorruptSupremeCourt
#Alito #AlitoIsATurd

By a vote of 5–4, the Supreme Court found that “waters” refers only to “‘streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes’ and to adjacent wetlands that are ‘indistinguishable’ from those bodies of water due to a continuous surface connection.” 2/2
#corruptsupremecourt

Michael and Chantell Sackett bought land near Priest Lake, Idaho, &backfilled the wetlands on the property to build a home. The EPA found they had violated the Clean Water Act, which prohibits putting pollutants into “the waters of the United States.” Officials told them to restore the site or face penalties of more than $40,000 a day. 1/2
#corruptsupremecourt

We're in a climate crisis, and the Supreme Court just gutted 50 years of federal protection over our wetlands.
#corruptsupremecourt

How is it that 9 unelected judges, some who have reportedly been accepting bribes from wealthy business owners, 1/3 who were appointed by a corrupt president, can overrule decades of precedent, gutting federal protections, and make detrimental decisions over our bodies and land?
The Supreme Court is Corrupt
#corruptsupremecourt

Yet another example of the corrupt and compromised nature of the current, highly partisan, right-wing stacked court. Just as the GOP is the willing servant of corporations and the wealthy, it is becoming increasingly clear that the GOP-stacked supreme court is equally willing to bend over backward to serve the interests of the wealthy and large corporations. The need for reform grows ever more urgent!!

"Why are these conflicts allowed?" Corporate giving to SCOTUS-linked group sparks blowback | Salon.com https://www.salon.com/2023/01/01/why-are-these-conflicts-allowed-corporate-giving-to-scotus-linked-group-sparks-blowback_partner/

#PartisanCaptureOfJudiciary
#Pay2Play
#CorruptSupremeCourt
#ReformSupremeCourt

"Alarm and concern were expressed Saturday in response to new reporting about a charitable group with close ties to the U.S. Supreme Court that has been soliciting and accepting donations from corporate interests and far-right activists with cases before the court.

The New York Times exposé focused on the activities and fundraising of the Supreme Court Historical Society, a nonprofit that claims its mission is "dedicated to the collection and preservation" of the court's history.

While the group refused to disclose its donors to the Times, reporters from the newspaper determined that much of the funding came from powerful companies like Chevron, Goldman Sachs, Time Warner and Facebook as well as anti-abortion activists like the Rev. Rob Schenck.

According to the newspaper:

The society has raised more than $23 million over the last two decades. Because of its nonprofit status, it does not have to publicly disclose its donors — and declined when asked to do so. But The New York Times was able to identify the sources behind more than $10.7 million raised since 2003, the first year for which relevant records were available.

At least $6.4 million — or 60 percent — came from corporations, special interest groups, or lawyers and firms that argued cases before the court, according to an analysis of archived historical society newsletters and publicly available records that detail grants given to the society by foundations. Of that, at least $4.7 million came from individuals or entities in years when they had a pending interest in a federal court case on appeal or at the high court, records show.

In the case of Chevron, the oil giant actively gave to the society even as it had a pending climate litigation working its way through the court.

In response to the new revelations, public interest attorney Steven Donzinger, who was himself targeted by Chevron for his work aimed at holding the company to account for its polluting activities in Ecuador, said the implications were "horrifying."

"Why are these conflicts allowed?" asked Donzinger.

Others quoted by the Times said the effort by people like Schenck, who admits to using the charitable group as a way to get other anti-abortion activists closer to the justices, creates a clear conflict of interest.

Charles Fried, a Harvard Law professor who once served as solicitor general in the Reagan administration and counts himself a donor to the Historical Society, told the newspaper he was so "horrified" by Schenck's behavior that he may no longer give.

"It's disgusting," Fried said. "Many of the people who contribute have the same reasons I do. You go to a cocktail party and support a good cause. But it turns out that for some people it's not that innocent."

While the Times notes that the Historical Society is "ostensibly independent of the judicial branch of government," the reality is that "the two are inextricably intertwined," with court justices serving as chair of the board and hosting gala events where exclusive access is reportedly part of the allure.

The left-leaning Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) said the reporting raises "significant questions" about the group which has "raked in millions — a significant chunk of it from groups with cases before the Court" over the last two decades.

Fix the Court, which acts as a watchdog organization for the Supreme Court, said the justification for the Historical Society's existence just doesn't hold water.

Gabe Roth, the group's executive director, told the Times that if money was an issue for funding such a project it would be the best solution — one free of ethical concerns — for Congress to simply appropriate the money needed to maintain the history of the Supreme Court."