Kevin Karhan :verified: · @kkarhan
943 followers · 53923 posts · Server mstdn.social@stanford @kobayashi90 well, my notation proposal is just a way to note down the #IPv6 and it could allow for a "#4over6" transitional mechalism (similar to #6over4) by specifying a fixed /96 subnet for automatic PAT+NAT so we'd not have shit like #DualStackLite with #CGNAT which is just horrible.
Bonus Points if your (mobile) ISP uses RFC1918 adress spaces, bricking #VPN's!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/6over4
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT
#VPN #cgnat #dualstacklite #6over4 #4over6 #IPv6
Kevin Karhan :verified: · @kkarhan
898 followers · 48815 posts · Server mstdn.social@JanFi0PN leider nur "#BisZu" ohne #SLA's oder garantierte Bandbreiten und dann wohl auch mit kapittem #DualStackLite / #CGNAT.
#cgnat #dualstacklite #sla #biszu
Kevin Karhan :verified: · @kkarhan
759 followers · 35534 posts · Server mstdn.social@lamp weird...
Personally I think that proper #DualStack should be mandatory.
Otherwise we'd completed #IPv6 transitions, because #CGNAT + #DualStackLite reward #lazyness in terms of #IPv4.
#ipv4 #lazyness #dualstacklite #cgnat #IPv6 #dualstack
Kevin Karhan :verified: · @kkarhan
726 followers · 34049 posts · Server mstdn.social@alisonw @alexhaydock Worse is that they don't even do #DualStackLite aka #IPv6 + #CGNAT.