How hyperauthorship - more than 100 authors on a scientific paper - is challenging the definition and 'coin' of scientific authorship.
For all the logistical challenges associated with large author lists, it may also be addressing long-standing under-recognition of scientific contributions.
This was such an interesting piece to write for @Nature
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#Science #authorship #Hyperauthorship #Multiauthorship #research
#science #authorship #hyperauthorship #multiauthorship #research
97 authors on the 2018 speleothem isotopes (SISAL) database paper, so it is not quite #hyperauthorship
Hyperauthorship - a new trend in academia for papers with hundred of authors. It seems a good thing for supporting equity and diversity, but also has new challenges.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#academia #publishing #science #scicomm #hyperauthorship #authorship #authorshipanalysis
#academia #publishing #science #scicomm #hyperauthorship #authorship #authorshipanalysis