Lead Creation just filed an amended complaint and, yes, it still improperly demands § 289 damages: https://www.scribd.com/document/620526276/Lead-Creation-v-Schedule-A-8-23-cv-00049-Amended-Complaint

#ScheduleA #UtilityPatents #Remedies #ImproperDisgorgementDemands #LeadCreation

And another one from the same company/attorney: https://www.scribd.com/document/618707287/Lead-Creation-v-Schedule-A-8-23-cv-00049-Complaint

Remember, Section 289 damages are only available for design patent infringement, *not* for utility patent infringement. See Brown v. Generac Power Sys., Inc., No. 20-22434-CIV, 2021 WL 1030229, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 27, 2021), report and recommendation adopted, No. 20-22434-CIV, 2021 WL 1022872 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 17, 2021).

#ScheduleA #UtilityPatents #Remedies #ImproperDisgorgementDemands #LeadCreation

Just thinking of this one again today: Brown v. Generac Power Sys., Inc., No. 20-22434-CIV, 2021 WL 1030229, at *11 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 27, 2021), report and recommendation adopted, No. 20-22434-CIV, 2021 WL 1022872 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 17, 2021).

#DesignPatents #Litigation #Rule11 #ImproperDisgorgementDemands

Lead Creation has filed an amended complaint, in which it still improperly demands design patent damages for utility patent infringement: https://www.scribd.com/document/615692835/Lead-Creation-v-Schedule-A-1st-Amended-Complaint

#ScheduleA #UtilityPatents #Remedies #ImproperDisgorgementDemands

Starting a new hashtag, #ImproperDisgorgementDemands, for....guess what?

So no, you're NOT "entitled to recover Defendants’ total profits from Defendants’ infringement."

#UtilityPatents #Remedies #ImproperDisgorgementDemands

See these? NOT design patents.

#UtilityPatents #Remedies #ImproperDisgorgementDemands

Oh look, another complaint seeking design patent damages for utility patent infringement: https://www.scribd.com/document/613347301/Ocugiene-v-Thermamedx-Complaint (Nope, still not a thing.)

#UtilityPatents #Remedies #ImproperDisgorgementDemands

Ugh, no. This is NOT a design patent. https://www.scribd.com/document/613328146/Lead-Creation-v-Schedule-A-TRO-Memo-SDNY #DesignPatents #ImproperDisgorgementDemands

Oh look, a Schedule A case that seeks § 289 damages for utility patent infringement: https://www.scribd.com/document/613325328/Lead-Creation-v-Schedule-A-Complaint-SDNY (h/t @sqfreak)

In case you don't know: Section 289 damages are only available for design patent infringement, *not* for utility patent infringement. See https://www.scribd.com/document/496685616/Brown-v-Generac-Power-Sys-R-R-on-Rule-11

#ScheduleA #UtilityPatents #Remedies #ImproperDisgorgementDemands