Funny. It seems I have more followers here from ecoevo.social than from my own econtwitter.net - let's optimistically count this as an appreciation of the #interdiscipinarity of my work 😉

I saw this paper today in Internet Archaeology:

https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.59.10

It is a nice overview of how #archaeology has developed over the years and of course nice #citation #networks

Quote: "Archaeology is revealed as a consistently broad and developing subject drawing extensively on methods and approaches from the sciences, social sciences, arts and humanities. It is intrinsically international in practice."

I love the #interdiscipinarity or archaeology!

Another example of why I find "The Conversation" to be (more often) totally irrelevant and sometimes, like this, actively horrible.

A very badly presented argument about #interdiscipinarity. Claims without warrant or justification. Held together with a paste of whining.

Nothing in this article matches my experience or what I've learned actively researching these topics. #disciplines are usually the problem, not the solution.

#science #collaboration

https://theconversation.com/why-the-interdisciplinary-push-in-universities-is-actually-a-dangerous-antidisciplinary-trend-175511

Sorry to report that I have to learn wtf the Vancouver citation style is #interdiscipinarity #academicpublishing

Sorry to report that I have to learn wtf the Vancouver citation style is #interdiscipinarity #academicpublishing