Gates Files · @gatesfiles
25 followers · 88 posts · Server mastodon.world

Happy friends. After a little break is back, serving us magic, laughter and wonderful conversations. This week, sat down with newest .
I’m picturing big hugs, check it out on your fave podcast platform!

#trektuesday #investigates #gatesmcfadden #spaceson #edspeleers

Last updated 2 years ago

Gates Files · @gatesfiles
23 followers · 70 posts · Server mastodon.world

Grab your ear plugs and enjoy another episode of in which sat down to talk to
Maybe they’ll talk medical stuff? Find out, give it a listen on your favorite podcast platform.

#investigates #gatesmcfadden #AlexanderSiddig

Last updated 2 years ago

PhoenixSerenity · @msquebanh
1328 followers · 13130 posts · Server mastodon.sdf.org

taught hard truths about .
Younge is one of Britain’s most celebrated & of . He was ’s 1st , renowned for his work with . Younge’s - Dispatches From The Diaspora, what it means to be black today.

...Younge learned many of the which shaped his view of how are treated in predominantly .

heraldscotland.com/politics/23

#scotland #garyyounge #racism #journalists #professor #sociology #britain #black #newspapercolumnist #theguardian #newbook #investigates #lessons #blackpeople #whitesocieties #author #book

Last updated 2 years ago

Only The Janeway · @OnlyTheJaneway
214 followers · 99 posts · Server mastodon.world
Elena. · @theresmiling
202 followers · 1482 posts · Server sueden.social

I just listened to the recent episode of Gates McFadden‘s podcast , where she talked to Kate Mulgrew. This was a beautiful conversation. The best one yet. They even talk about The Lamp („Long may it shine!“).

Go go go and listen! Now!

gatesmcfadden.com/podcast/

#investigates #startrek

Last updated 2 years ago

Gates Files · @gatesfiles
18 followers · 57 posts · Server mastodon.world

Premiere day it’s here! 🎉
Stop whatever you’re doing and give a listen to talking to

is guaranteed to give you great experiences, whether you’re working, chilling or even doing activity. 100% tested to work. Enjoy!

#gatesmcfadden #williamshatner #investigates

Last updated 3 years ago

Gates Files · @gatesfiles
14 followers · 47 posts · Server mastodon.world

wearing t-shirt (the same I have by the way) is PURE GOLD.
Enjoy the 2 HQ photos from SiriusXM visit!
📸 gates-mcfadden.com/2023/02/13/

#gatesmcfadden #investigates

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #capital_gains #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #capital_gains #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #capital_gains #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #capital_gains #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #capital_gains #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #capital_gains #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #capital_gains #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #capital_gains #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

#INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS #Ponzi #stock_market #PONZI_SCHEME #Stock_buybacks #not #print_shares #buyback #DILUTION #comprehensive #ever_compiled #negative_sum #people #assume #ownership_instruments #investigates #ownership_assumption #never_receive_money #own #realize #profits #other_investors #google #telsa #facebook #NEVER #PAY #investors #investors_profits #dependent #new_investors #definition #SEO #RTB #HFT

Last updated 3 years ago