@legoktm But as #JusticeKagan wrote in Biden v. Nebraska: «The Court's first overreach in this case is deciding it at all. Under Article III of the Constitution, a plaintiff must have standing to challenge a government action. And that requires a personal stake—an injury in fact. [...] The Court acts as though it is an arbiter of political and policy disputes, rather than of cases and controversies.»
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-506_nmip.pdf
Lawrence got a fine. The injury was real.
“#SCOTUS #Justice #ElenaKagan said one could question why #Congress provided such protections when passing #Section230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which has been interpreted by courts to provide wide #immunity from lawsuits when the sites post content from outside parties.
“But she drew laughter when she wondered how far SCOTUS should go in cutting back such protection.
“‘You know, these are not like the nine greatest experts on the internet’ #JusticeKagan said.”
#scotus #justice #elenakagan #congress #section230 #immunity #justicekagan #notanexpert