Oh #LazyWeb and #LazyPachyderm! (/me makes obeisance)

Back in the day, we used three (3) axes for #cybersecurity authentication:

1. What you 𝘬𝘯𝘦𝘸 (such as a passphrase, &𝘤.);
2. What you 𝘩𝘢𝘥 (such as a token or physical key, &𝘤.); and
3. What you 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 (such as fingerprint, retinal scan, &𝘤.).

Is this still basically the case? Are any of these now considered (like #CRC or #MD5 checksum hashing for object verification) inadequate or passé? And/or have new modalities been added?

Thanks!

@spikebike @badnetmask

Thanks, folks! #LazyPachyderm FTW!

(And I mean "For The Win", not "Fudge The World" in this case!)

Meh. Next question for the #LazyWeb (or possibly the #LazyPachyderm): is there 𝘆𝗲𝘁 a reasonable #FOSS #Linux #imap #server package? The last time I looked (years ago), they all appeared to be pretty much crap, and even worse in some respects than GMail's semi-compliant implementation..