#NewPaper #PaperThread

Hot off the press! 🔥​
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105042

We performed a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies looking at interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) and contextualized the results using diverse public databases to develop new hypotheses on physiological processes potentially involved in INS.

Super-short summary: We report spatial convergence of INS in the right TPJ and left ventral PFC and find preliminary evidence for associations of INS with mentalizing and attention brain networks, GABA-mediated E/I balance, and disordered neurodevelopment.

What is he talking about, you ask? See below ⏬​

1/9

#NeuroScience #Neuro #Psych #Psychiatry #Psychology #Cognition #Brain #Communication #NeuroPaper #NeuroPaperThread #NewNeuroPaper #Science #Research #DataViz #DataScience
@neuroscience @neuro @cognition @fmri @phdstudents @academicchatter

@summerfieldlab Welcome! Good places to start are these hashtags (which can be followed, just like following people): #neuroscience #NeuroNewPaper #NeuroPaperThread ... and so many more. Tags are the way to discover what's going on without following a thousand people.

@chrisXrodgers @StefanoFusi #NeuroPaperThread #NeuroNewPaper

11) Also, I am on the job market this year, so please do not hesitate to reach out if you think I could be a good fit for a theoretical/computational faculty position in your department!

@chrisXrodgers @StefanoFusi #NeuroPaperThread #NeuroNewPaper

10) Thanks for reading until the end. Many more details in the main article and supplementary figures. Thanks for the support from our many funding agencies and to the
Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, and the Zuckerman Brain at Columbia University. Please reach out if you have any questions or suggestions!

@chrisXrodgers @StefanoFusi #NeuroPaperThread #NeuroNewPaper

9) Finally, we fit RNNs to perform an artificial equivalent of the task and found that the geometry of the representations is determined by the difficulty of the task, and RNNs trained on complex tasks can still form representations that can generalize to unseen conditions

@chrisXrodgers @StefanoFusi #NeuroPaperThread #NeuroNewPaper

8) This organization was not a simple consequence of somatotopy because all whiskers were represented in all columns (see also Rodgers et al 2021). This representational geometry can be useful for balancing generalization and flexible behavior

@chrisXrodgers @StefanoFusi #NeuroPaperThread #NeuroNewPaper

7) We realized that instead of a random and disorganized mixed code, the geometry of representations in S1 was best characterized by a low-dimensional scaffold with small perturbations towards higher dimensions. An approximately disentangled representation in orthogonal subspaces

@chrisXrodgers @StefanoFusi #NeuroPaperThread #NeuroNewPaper

6) Populations of S1 neurons were fit with encoding models of varying degrees of flexibility. We found that S1 activity was best explained by models that allowed for non-linear mixed selectivity rather than pure or linear mixed selectivity

@chrisXrodgers @StefanoFusi #NeuroPaperThread #NeuroNewPaper

5) We built a simulation of the task and changed the general parameters of the shapes. Linear integration was also sufficient for a variety of shapes, distances, angles, and sizes. Non-linear integration of touches was necessary for tasks with complex semantics of groups of shapes

#NeuroPaperThread
#NeuroNewPaper
@chrisXrodgers @StefanoFusi

4) We monitored whisker movement and contacts and used linear and non-linear classifiers to decode the identity of the shape and the choice of the animal on a trial-by-trial basis. We found that linear integration is sufficient for both shape’s identity and the animals’ choice

@chrisXrodgers @StefanoFusi #NeuroPaperThread #NeuroNewPaper

Shortly, mice were trained to discriminate between concave and convex shapes using only their whiskers. They accumulated touches across time and whiskers to perform the discrimination task

@chrisXrodgers @StefanoFusi
#NeuroPaperThread #NeuroNewPaper

2) This deep dive into neural representations follows a previous study led by
@chrisXrodgers
at the Randy Bruno lab, where the task and neural recordings are described in depth, and very interesting results about task dependency are presented https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089662732100372X

#NeuroPaperThread #NeuroNewPaper

1) Our article “The geometry of cortical representations of touch in rodents” with @chrisXrodgers Randy Bruno and @StefanoFusi is finally out! In brief, we found that whisker contacts in mice S1 are represented in approximately orthogonal subspaces https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-022-01237-9 🧵​👇​

@NicoleCRust @kendmiller

I’d be in on #NeuroPaperThread and #NeuroNewPaper. Although I’d prefer #NewNeuroPaper bc grammar 😋.

And I am not sure how much sense it makes to let a single field „claim“ a very general tag such as #PaperThread. It would be more elegant to establish a convention for all fields, i.e., #PaperThread for field-independent use, #MLPaperThread or #AIPaperThread for the Sigmoidians. Sorry folks 👀

@NicoleCRust field-specific hashtags for paper announcements and threads might not work so well for those of us with poor memories and interests across multiple fields, because we would have to remember the specific hashtags for each field.

The Mastodon advanced web interface allows you to follow combinations of hashtags (instructions here: https://blog.djnavarro.net/posts/2022-11-03_what-i-know-about-mastodon/#tracking-hashtags) but it doesn't appear to allow for (#neuroscience AND (#NewPaper OR #PaperThread)), plus I think I found a bug.

For now, I think I will follow (#PaperThread OR #NewPaper OR #NeuroPaperThread OR #NeuroNewPaper OR ...).

Plus, I'm copying in @cogsci #CogSci and #CompCogSci because this is an issue that needs to be discussed in all research communities.

@kendmiller @NicoleCRust @toddhorowitz @LeonDLotter @phdstudents@a.gup.pe @academicchatter @neuroscience @cognition

Although I love #MastoPiece, I think descriptiveness wins: #NeuroPaperThread would be my winner. I'm biased, because as a German speaker I am drawn to long composite nouns 😅 🤷‍♂️

A big thanks to @kendmiller + for helping the #neuroscience community get its hashtag act together!

https://neuromatch.social/@kendmiller@qoto.org/109645950754401219

For neuro paper threads: sigmoid.social/about/more has already claimed #PaperThread and #NewPaper (the latter announcing a paper without a thread) for the AI community. I enjoy seeing their papers too, but we need a distinct tag for neuro papers. For a thread, ... maybe we want something simple like #NeuroPaperThread and #NeuroNewPaper?

Great idea Ken - let's do this.

➡️​​EVERYONE: BOOKMARK THIS! ⬅️​ and follow those hashtags. And then don't hold back. After all, it's what we all show up here for: to hear what you've figured out and learn from you.

#neuroscience #neuroAI #psychology

(I realize that some of these suggestions would best be used simulatenously, e.g., #newPaper and #preprint have obviously different content. What I am searching for is a common tag for *threads* explaining research articles, not only posts announcing a new publication 🙂.
I had to drop one tag bc of the 5-option limit in polls, and I went for #mastoPrint as it was my own suggestion.)

Some further thoughts:
One could combine these tags in a standardized way with research field names, e.g. #newNeuroPaper, #neuroPreprint, or #neuroPaperThread.
Also, please remember to use #camelCase or #CamelCase notation in these tags for screenreader accessibility!

Tagging some people who responded to my first post (sorry for bothering you!):
@mwt @toddhorowitz @achterbrain @PessoaBrain @elduvelle @Brendanjones @gdiak @EricLawton @annettamallon @UlrikeHahn @ryneches @x1l3f @nyates314 @bsweber @ArneBab @tfardet @emergentnexus @DrAnneCarpenter @f @harcel @MarkHanson @Iris