Anyone know of any tools or standards for capturing the kind of filesystem #provenance metadata (e.g. modification times) that often gets lost in #digipres upload/replication?

#OCFL, for instance, just says either use a filesystem image, or store FS metadata "in an additional file"—no suggestions as to what format that additional file might take.

I could make something up (and did, for my student project last fall), but surely someone's already thought harder about this than I have.

For all of you who are still using a #Fedora (Commons) #Repository vers. 3: #Lyrasis just released a migration toolkit to jump to vers. 6. I strongly recommend to go to vers. 6 just because of the use of #OCFL https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/FF/Fedora+Migration+Paths+and+Tools

Die Version 6 von @FedoraRepo@twitter.com von #Lyrasis wirft ihre Schatten voraus. Das Alpha Release ist gerade erschienen. Ein Überblick über die neue Features unter https://duraspace.org/fedora-6-alpha-release-is-here/ Spannend in meinen Augen der Support von #OCFL https://ocfl.io/

@phu Bei diesem Track bin ich heute morgen auch. Das #OCFL hört sich mein Kollege Oliver an. Er kann später sicher berichten. #openrepo2019

oxford comma 4 lyfe #ocfl

Wondering what if any intersection there is between the Oxford Common Filesystem Layout (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fedora-community/k7sU1IosEIU) and MOAB (http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/8482). I need some time to read up on both to better understand them.

#ocfl #moab