LK-99 lessons: https://nitter.cz/MichaelSFuhrer/status/1689446900284764160#m - an accurate #openpeerreview that took less than three weeks. But, according to https://aisa.sp.unipi.it/dicers-oaths-ore-coara-and-the-italian-national-agency-for-the-evaluation-of-the-university-and-research-systems/ , open peer review cannot be scientific.

LK-99 lessons: https://nitter.cz/MichaelSFuhrer/status/1689446900284764160#m - an accurate #openpeerreview that took less than three weeks. But, according to https://aisa.sp.unipi.it/dicers-oaths-ore-coara-and-the-italian-national-agency-for-the-evaluation-of-the-university-and-research-systems/ , open peer review cannot be scientific.

#F1000Research aimed at #OpenPeerReview but is utterly failing. Sending a reminder just one week after a first request for a review (on version 2 of a text), and then saying nothing - effectively refusing to publish the review - for *six months* despite two reminders defeats the whole idea of open peer review.

#Qeios seems to be doing the opposite - after publishing a review immediately, it clarifies by email that it's a *preprint* server.

@academicchatter

[1] https://codeberg.org/boud/open_science_meta/src/branch/main/open_peer_review/F1000_git_report_CCBYSA

#OpenPeerReview is a nice idea, but what do you do when the article is so bad that it should have never been put up for review? :-(

The authors of the #AfricArXiv
#preprint "Ten simple rules for successful and sustainable African research collaboration" are seeking further feedback via http://PREreview.org. Consider helping them out!

👉 https://prereview.org/preprints/doi-10.6084-m9.figshare.22904504.v1

#PreprintReview #OpenPeerReview

@academicchatter

Any opinions on #Qeios [0][1] for #OpenPeerReview? Columbia Uni Mailman SchPublicHealth [2] and NYT [3] seem to take it seriously. I'm rather annoyed at #F1000Research , which pressured me for a fast report on v2 of a paper but after 5 months and several reminders hasn't published my review of v2 [4].

Qeios sounds serious. Is it?

[0] https://www.qeios.com/publishing-policy

[1] https://www.qeios.com/recent-articles

[2] https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/news/new-journal-seeks-reduce-bias-scientific-publishing

[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/28/opinion/peer-review-research-studies.html

[4] https://f1000research.com/articles/11-344/v2

ing.grid works under an #openpeerreview system, running directly in a dedicated #preprint platform. Reviewers have the option of disclosing their names, increasing transparency and having scientific credit for the contribution https://www.inggrid.org/site/reviewprocess/

Hello, #preprints enthusiasts!
If you or your friend is interested in molecular and cellular neurobiology, cancer biology, computational neuroscience, or meta-research and wants to learn #PeerReview skills while helping colleagues who post #preprints, this opportunity is for you!

Join the Crowd Preprint Review!

This is an opportunity for all researchers and students interested in #PeerReview and #preprints!

#OpenScience #OpenPeerReview
#RecognizingPreprintReview

https://asapbio.org/crowd-review-2023

#ECRs often lack the opportunities to gain #PeerReview skills.
We are here to help!
Take advantage of an opportunity to learn about #OpenPeerReview and help other researchers by giving them helpful feedback on their manuscripts!
Join Crowd Preprint Review groups! 👇

If you are interested in molecular and cellular neurobiology, cancer biology, computational neuroscience, metabolism, or meta-research, check out the link for the details on getting involved!
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScOR3oM_9OOhRKxjQvupN8YLtaGImOfKskkllrveTWIqrJUVg/viewform

I just published my first #PreReview! 🎉

(A PreReview is an open peer review of a preprint)

https://beta.prereview.org/reviews/7976117 / doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7976117

#preprint #PeerReview #OpenPeerReview

h/t @prereview

SOCIOS ist gestartet! Wir entwickeln im Rahmen des #DFG-Projekts SOCIOS in Kooperation mit vier sozialwissenschaftlichen #Fachinformationsdienst|en eine digitale Publikationsplattform für kollaboratives Schreiben und #OpenPeerReview in den #Sozialwissenschaften. @SocioHub_FID @fidpol #FID Sozial- & Kulturanthropologie | #EVIFA #FIDKriminologie @UniKoeln https://www.ub.uni-koeln.de/forschen_publizieren/projekte/index_ger.html

Thanks to @HeidiSeibold for a lovely blog post on PCI RR!

What a great summary of how @PeerCommunityIn and PCI RR work, and thanks for announcing that we're recruiting recommenders (editors)!

https://heidiseibold.ck.page/posts/peer-community-in-registered-reports
#RegisteredReports #OpenResearch #OpenPeerReview

A new preprint is available. Read and comment on "From Ontology to Metadata: A Crawler for Script-based Workflows" https://preprints.inggrid.org/repository/view/12/ #RDM #MetadataExtraction #Ontology #OAJournal #openpeerreview

Hi 👋 We are ing.grid, a new journal focused on #FAIRdata management in #engineeringsciences, now on Mastodon :)

ing.grid is an #openaccess journal with an #openpeerreview process. Besides articles and tutorials, ing.grid welcomes datasets, APIs and software.

We are accepting submissions: https://www.inggrid.org/news/27/

Recently, we published our first peer-reviewed article: https://www.inggrid.org/news/33/

#FDM #RDM #ResearchDataManagement #openscience @nfdi4ing

Unser @tibosl startet am 11. Mai (17 - 19 Uhr) das erste Meetup der #OpenScience Community Hannover (#OSCH). All jene aus der Region Hannover, die sich zu Open Science, #OpenScholarship, #OpenSciencePolicy, #OpenPeerReview, #OpenSourceSoftware und zur Bedeutung von Reproduzierbarkeit, Transparenz und Inklusivität in der Forschung und zu vielen weiteren Themen rund um Open Science austauschen wollen, sind herzlich eingeladen!

Mehr dazu: https://www.tib.eu/de/die-tib/neuigkeiten-und-termine/termine/detail/austausch-zu-offener-wissenschaft-erstes-open-science-community-hannover-meetup

@dasaptaerwin

#F1000Research is not going to get many reviewers for its #OpenPeerReview system if after two and a half months, a review of version 2 of a paper is still not published:

https://f1000research.com/articles/11-344/v2

Receipt of my second review was confirmed by email on 6 Feb 2023 ...

#F1000 had a nice idea, but currently it doesn't seem to be working.

#OpenScience

https://framapiaf.org/@boud/108669474100439567

In #openpeerreview Daniela Tafani "L’«etica» come specchietto per le allodole. Sistemi di intelligenza artificiale e violazioni dei diritti" https://commentbfp.sp.unipi.it/letica-come-specchietto-per-le-allodole/ #AI #SALAMI #acchiappacitrulli

In #openpeerreview Daniela Tafani "L’«etica» come specchietto per le allodole. Sistemi di intelligenza artificiale e violazioni dei diritti" https://commentbfp.sp.unipi.it/letica-come-specchietto-per-le-allodole/ #AI #SALAMI #acchiappacitrulli

Also be sure to check out the fantastic article 'Preprints Mean Peer Review Can Be Reimagined as it Should Always Have Been' by @eLife 's
Stuart King:
https://charleston-hub.com/2023/03/preprints-mean-peer-review-can-be-reimagined-as-it-should-always-have-been/

#preprintpeerreview #openpeerreview

Read @prereview director
@Neurosarda's article 'Tackling Bias and Inequity in the Peer Review Process with PREreview' in the most recent issue of Against the Grain: https://charleston-hub.com/2023/03/tackling-bias-and-inequity-in-the-peer-review-process-with-prereview/

#openpeerreview #biasinpeerreview #equityinSTEM