Mathematicians Christian Jäkel and Lennart Van Hirtum et al. simultaneously discover the 42-digit Dedekind number after 32 years of trying.
The exact values of the Dedekind numbers are known for \(0\leq n\leq9\):
\(2,3,6,20,168,7581,7828354,2414682040998,\)
\(56130437228687557907788,\)
\(286386577668298411128469151667598498812366\)
(sequence A000372 in the OEIS)
Summation formula👇
Kisielewicz (1988) rewrote the logical definition of antichains into the following arithmetic formula for the Dedekind numbers:
\[\displaystyle M(n)=\sum_{k=1}^{2^{2^n}} \prod_{j=1}^{2^n-1} \prod_{i=0}^{j-1} \left(1-b_i^k b_j^k\prod_{m=0}^{\log_2 i} (1-b_m^i+b_m^i b_m^j)\right)\]
where \(b_i^k\) is the \(i\)th bit of the number \(k\), which can be written using the floor function as
\[\displaystyle b_i^k=\left\lfloor\frac{k}{2^i}\right\rfloor - 2\left\lfloor\frac{k}{2^{i+1}}\right\rfloor.\]
However, this formula is not helpful for computing the values of \(M(n)\) for large \(n\) due to the large number of terms in the summation.
Asymptotics:
The logarithm of the Dedekind numbers can be estimated accurately via the bounds
\[\displaystyle{n\choose \lfloor n/2\rfloor}\le \log_2 M(n)\le {n\choose \lfloor n/2\rfloor}\left(1+O\left(\frac{\log n}{n}\right)\right).\]
Here the left inequality counts the number of antichains in which each set has exactly \(\lfloor n/2\rfloor\) elements, and the right inequality was proven by Kleitman & Markowsky (1975).
#DedekindNumber #Dedekind #NumberTheory #Mathematics #Sequence #Discovery #Mathematicians #Challenging #RichardDedekind #DifficultProblem #MathHistory #Pustam #ChallengingProblem #EGR #PustamRaut
#pustamraut #egr #challengingproblem #pustam #mathhistory #difficultproblem #richarddedekind #challenging #mathematicians #discovery #sequence #mathematics #numbertheory #dedekind #dedekindnumber
Mathematicians Christian Jäkel and Lennart Van Hirtum et al. simultaneously discover the 42-digit Dedekind number after 32 years of trying.
The exact values of the Dedekind numbers are known for \(0\leq n\leq9\):
\(2,3,6,20,168,7581,7828354,2414682040998,56130437228687557907788,286386577668298411128469151667598498812366\)
(sequence A000372 in the OEIS)
Summation formula👇
Kisielewicz (1988) rewrote the logical definition of antichains into the following arithmetic formula for the Dedekind numbers:
\[\displaystyle M(n)=\sum_{k=1}^{2^{2^n}} \prod_{j=1}^{2^n-1} \prod_{i=0}^{j-1} \left(1-b_i^k b_j^k\prod_{m=0}^{\log_2 i} (1-b_m^i+b_m^i b_m^j)\right)\]
where \(b_i^k\) is the \(i\)th bit of the number \(k\), which can be written using the floor function as
\[\displaystyle b_i^k=\left\lfloor\frac{k}{2^i}\right\rfloor - 2\left\lfloor\frac{k}{2^{i+1}}\right\rfloor.\]
However, this formula is not helpful for computing the values of \(M(n)\) for large \(n\) due to the large number of terms in the summation.
Asymptotics:
The logarithm of the Dedekind numbers can be estimated accurately via the bounds
\[\displaystyle{n\choose \lfloor n/2\rfloor}\le \log_2 M(n)\le {n\choose \lfloor n/2\rfloor}\left(1+O\left(\frac{\log n}{n}\right)\right).\]
Here the left inequality counts the number of antichains in which each set has exactly \(\lfloor n/2\rfloor\) elements, and the right inequality was proven by Kleitman & Markowsky (1975).
#DedekindNumber #Dedekind #NumberTheory #Mathematics #Sequence #Discovery #Mathematicians #Challenging #RichardDedekind #DifficultProblem #MathHistory #Pustam #ChallengingProblem #EGR #PustamRaut
#pustamraut #egr #challengingproblem #pustam #mathhistory #difficultproblem #richarddedekind #challenging #mathematicians #discovery #sequence #mathematics #numbertheory #dedekind #dedekindnumber