TRUE - at least the AAM needs to be available in OA under a CC-BY licence, the VoR can be behind the publisher's paywall. This could arise if you were to apply the #RightsRetentionStrategy statement: “This research was funded in whole or in part by the [Funder][Grant number]. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission."
(https://www.coalition-s.org/rights-retention-strategy) #greenOA

So, I have some news about my CC-BY submitted paper, applying a rights retention strategy to by-pass the copyright transfer to the publisher (Springer in this case).

We have a mixed outcome.

#OpenScience #OpenAccess #RightsRetentionStrategy

RT @hugo_catherine
👍Universités Durham, Lancaster, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Sheffield, & York @N8research adoptent la stratégie de non cession des droits
#rightsretentionstrategy #RSS #openaccess #openrepository #sustainable https://twitter.com/chris_pressler/status/1617438952671313920

"Que répondez-vous aux chercheurs et chercheuses qui craignent la réaction de leur éditeur ?...Si vous êtes face à de telles postures, la cOAlition S vous invite à changer de revue, et a minima à le faire savoir publiquement : « name and shame »." Suffisant ?

RT @OpenSci_Pasteur@twitter.com

Le @CNRS@twitter.com demande désormais aux chercheurs de ne plus céder leurs droits sur leurs publications
#RightsRetentionStrategy #OpenAccess
https://www.cnrs.fr/fr/cnrsinfo/il-ny-pas-de-raison-que-les-scientifiques-fassent-une-cession-exclusive-gratuite-de-leurs

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/OpenSci_Pasteur/status/1602692839661617153