This guy clearly has no idea what the phrase "human intelligence" means. For instance, it's a long long way from the advanced curve fitting capability of today's AI. If there is a ever a computational equivalent of human intelligence, we won't call it Artificial Intelligence. We will just call it intelligence.
#Schmidhuber #AI

"Schmidhuber believes AI will advance to the point where it surpasses human intelligence"

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/may/07/rise-of-artificial-intelligence-is-inevitable-but-should-not-be-feared-father-of-ai-says

Jürgen Schmidhuber is the spiritual successor to Konrad Zuse and Gödel and, frankly, he doesn't get enough credit for his work.

When you research the background of machine learning, and understand the history, there are a lot of early pioneers who don't get enough credit.

I often feel education misses out by not always teaching the context of discoveries, just the methods.

#schmidhuber #gödel #godel #machinelearning

I am no historian, but I do have a fascination for certain histories of science. I understand and enjoy the #schmidhuber (verb) meme, but I am worried that the actual problems are being dismissed too easily. AI and DL were developed by small, fractured communities, in the Before Academic Twitter Era. Many ideas were discovered and redescovered, many were forgotten (and may be useful).
Missing credit attribution and historical context can and should be fixed, rather laughed about.