Dear @univroma3 ,
Do you agree that one of your profs, owning the patent on an invention for a 🧫 #microbiology test, writes 18 sci papers 📄 (first in #predatoryjournals then in @plosone and @ESCMID ‘s #EJCMID) with employees of the manufacturer of that test, without EVER declaring any #ConflictOfInterest ? 🧐 #scienceintegrity
https://pubpeer.com/publications/3ED71F62D2476ED0A635E9FD97B8C4

Hot topics in science
#OpenAccess
#ImpactFactor
#PeerReview
#ScienceIntegrity

Quote: “My expectation is that this initial delisting … is only the tip of the iceberg”

https://www.science.org/content/article/fast-growing-open-access-journals-stripped-coveted-impact-factors

👉thanks Martin Faucher for sharing

RT @Adrian_H
Just got served in the $SAVA Cassava v Bredt lawsuit while at my poster discussing Simufilam science and binding at the #ctad22 conference.

#scienceintegrity

http://www.Simuflimflam.com

RT @SndrGnzTorrecil@twitter.com

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf7YcQsLrRo3oRl9K0x8nCsxLfOVc91z-8DjcIUjRJPC2k9Eg/viewform?usp=sf_link

Can you help us?

Remember to participate in our questionnaire.

It is totally anonymous and it will only take you 5 minutes.

@OIntegridadEsp@twitter.com

#ScienceIntegrity

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/SndrGnzTorrecil/status/1599000294402105344

Powerful commentary on the racist machinery behind scientific debate. This commentary by Steven O. Roberts unravels how difficult is to get a sit at the table in the academic debate by scholars from underrepresented backgrounds. I only hope perspective on psychological science takes actions and creates mechanisms to ensure transparency and integrity in the editorial process. Here is the very important commentary https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xk4yu #scienceintegrity #academicintegrity