Ben Waber · @bwaber
688 followers · 2639 posts · Server hci.social

First was an informative conversation with Bruno Van den Bosch and @BostoenFriso analyzing the (lack of) European protectionism in at . There's a lot in here about how EU antitrust penalties function, along with some surprising nuggets about fine disclosure youtube.com/watch?v=ggHQHCII0v (2/11)

#antitrust #stanfordcodex

Last updated 1 year ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
623 followers · 2249 posts · Server hci.social

Next was a great examination of the current state of computational within antitrust agences with Teodora Groza and Thibault Schrepel at . This is the second annual report from the group, and the strides being made by different antitrust agencies around the world was fascinating. Highly recommend youtube.com/watch?v=TVo0SDQuH5 (7/8)

#antitrust #stanfordcodex

Last updated 1 year ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
464 followers · 1108 posts · Server hci.social

Next was an exciting discussion with Thibault Schrepel on APIs at . Thibault presents a compelling case for why it makes sense to computationally define law in many cases, and discusses how providing APIs into the law can aid antitrust practice and enforcement lnkd.in/gVn6kSVQ (7/9)

#antitrust #stanfordcodex #law

Last updated 1 year ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
401 followers · 561 posts · Server hci.social

Next was an excellent panel on important research topics in computational antitrust (there are a lot!) with Thibault Schrepel, Teodora Groza, Björn ten Seldam, Aleksandra Wierzbicka, Kirill Ryabtsev, Thaiane Abreu, and Alexandru Șotropa at 's Computational conference. It's almost impossible to succinctly summarize the variety of topics covered, highly recommend youtube.com/watch?v=VNbFYOnOaT (3/12)

#stanfordcodex #antitrust

Last updated 2 years ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
397 followers · 554 posts · Server hci.social

Next was a great panel on the future of computational antitrust with Daniel Crane, Michal Gal, William Kovacic, Jonathan Askin, and Aleksandra Wierzbicka at Computational conference. The discussion gets into some meaty points around why computational antitrust is important and how to increase uptake by . Highly recommend youtube.com/watch?v=IA9xLJZDtZ (3/7)

#stanfordcodex #antitrust #regulators

Last updated 2 years ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
394 followers · 543 posts · Server hci.social

Next was an interesting talk on the potential of to weaken power by @skominers at 's Computational Conference. Other work has made me somewhat skeptical of this claim, but it's still intriguing to think about these possibilities youtube.com/watch?v=6qWXV2sYH- (3/11)

#web3 #platform #stanfordcodex #antitrust

Last updated 2 years ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
390 followers · 532 posts · Server hci.social

Next was a fantastic talk by @marklemley on measuring interlocks at 's Computational conference. Mapping and analyzing board interlock from publicly company seems like a no-brainer for regulators, especially given that much of this activity is illegal! Highly recommend youtube.com/watch?v=kRuOmWbnNp (4/9)

#board #stanfordcodex #antitrust #networks #data

Last updated 2 years ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
384 followers · 517 posts · Server hci.social

Next was a nice roundtable with different agencies' detailing current applications of computational antitrust at the Computational Antitrust Conference with David Dorrell, Romana Skácelová, Daniel Westrik, Gerard Gimenez, and Teodora Groza. Lots of variance in the tools being deployed, and I'm looking forward to seeing how these different multinational agencies collaborate in the future youtube.com/watch?v=HPEqIPay3P (3/12)

#antitrust #stanfordcodex #regulation #law

Last updated 2 years ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
382 followers · 505 posts · Server hci.social

Next was a number of rapid-fire presentations at . The presentation by Alesia Ash, Erin Weaver, and Tate Richardson on legal innovation for was particularly good youtube.com/watch?v=z3tjAk0RUa (5/12)

#startup #stanfordcodex #tech #justice

Last updated 2 years ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
382 followers · 503 posts · Server hci.social

Next was a fantastic slate of talks on computational solutions (M&A , , etc.) at 's Computational Antitrust Conference by Siying (Kate) Cao, Victoriia Noskova, Oliver Budzinski, Eleanor Fox, Doug Melamed, and Teodora Groza. Highly recommend youtube.com/watch?v=Wfaj8DfCns (3/12)

#antitrust #simulations #nlp #stanfordcodex

Last updated 2 years ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
380 followers · 482 posts · Server hci.social

First up was a lightning round review of how practitioners can get started in computational with Yann Guthmann, Thibault Schrepel, Alex Sotropa, and Thaiane Abreu at 's Computational Antitrust Conference. Love to see make an appearance! youtube.com/watch?v=gs07BGOCbC (2/12)

#antitrust #stanfordcodex #networkanalysis

Last updated 2 years ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
377 followers · 478 posts · Server hci.social

Last was a presentation by Manish Agnihotri on his at . When is applied to corporate it can help quickly summarize vast, often opaque contracts, although I'd like to see more about blind spots in products like this particularly when developed by insular teams youtube.com/watch?v=ThlW07Vp8t (6/6)

#legal #analytics #startup #agni #stanfordcodex #nlp #law #data

Last updated 2 years ago

Ben Waber · @bwaber
377 followers · 476 posts · Server hci.social

Next was a fantastic panel on algorithmic cabal and detection at the Computational Antitrust conference with Joseph Harrington, Mary-Anne Williams, Mariah Kirubi, and Daniel Linna. This work is absolutely fascinating and the next frontier in , , and . Also I got to ask a question during the Q&A! Highly recommend youtube.com/watch?v=QAKezlG4w7 (4/6)

#antitrust #stanfordcodex #management #PeopleAnalytics #regulation

Last updated 2 years ago