@kazaroth EIAR is _amazing_. I absolutely loved it. It was so incredibly eye-opening to me. A lot of human “creativity” is anodyne as well. The trick here (and I don’t have an answer) is getting closer to a definition of human creativity. It will be tricky to define #statisticalremix or #statisticalcreativity unless we can compare and contrast them to #humancreativity in a meaningful way.

Thinking more and more about generative AI, I am troubled (to say the least) about the use of the word “creativity” with respect to these models.

Before anyone flames out, I can see both sides of the argument and have both strongly positive and strongly negative issues with each.

I wonder if a better term might be something like “statistical remix” or even “statistical creativity”?

#statisticalremix #statisticalcreativity

Thinking more and more about generative AI, I am troubled (to say the least) about the use of the word “creativity” with respect to these models.

Before anyone flames out, I can see both sides of the argument and have both strongly positive and strongly negative issues with each.

I wonder if a better term might be something like “statistical remix” or even “statistical creativity”?

#statisticalremix #statisticalcreativity