LisPi · @lispi314
654 followers · 14133 posts · Server mastodon.top

@mike805 @jeffcliff @brewsterkahle Additionally, for such hostile environments high-latency store & forward networks are better suited than either or .

Unfortunately generally gets shafted in people's prioritization & considerations, so there's much less work done on those at the moment.

#tor #i2p #asynchronouscommunication #dtn #storeandforward #delaytolerance #delaytolerantnetworking

Last updated 1 year ago

LisPi · @lispi314
227 followers · 3367 posts · Server mastodon.top

@dalias @DanielMicay I think you're more arguing about data consumption than bandwidth per se.

The vast majority of synchronous networking protocols account in exactly no way for data limitations.

That type of adverse condition is largely ignored in the design of basically everything other than where limitations in nodes' storage (which is actively involved and limits data) and so data simply cannot be ignored.

#delaytolerant #networking #storeandforward #dtn #dtns #asynchronouscommunication

Last updated 2 years ago

John Goerzen · @jgoerzen
928 followers · 2553 posts · Server floss.social

@ecliptik @w4v3 So both and are not much used anymore. Both were big in the . Both were ways of exhcanging information over phone lines, but now run mostly over . Both are , systems. The idea being, to send a message from point A to point D, system A might call up system B, B calls up C, and C calls up D. So a message may take hours or days to get across, in the old times. 1/

#storeandforward #asynchronous #Internet #1980s #fidonet #uucp

Last updated 2 years ago