achrilock · @achrilock
9 followers · 1561 posts · Server achrilock.social
Norobiik @Norobiik@noc.social · @Norobiik
460 followers · 7123 posts · Server noc.social

Of the four fundamental forces in nature only three – the electromagnetic force and the strong and weak nuclear forces – are explained by the of .

The model can't explain the fourth fundamental force, , or – a strange and mysterious substance thought to make up about 27% of the universe.

Scientists may be on brink of discovering fifth force of nature | | The Guardian
theguardian.com/science/2023/a

#theoreticalphysics #darkmatter #gravity #particlephysics #StandardModel

Last updated 1 year ago

Jeremy Mallin · @JeremyMallin
25 followers · 34 posts · Server autistics.life
Kieran D. Kelly · @kierandkelly
0 followers · 1 posts · Server me.dm
Tech news from Canada · @TechNews
496 followers · 13728 posts · Server mastodon.roitsystems.ca

I just realised that the integral over spacetime in the Dirac or Klein-Gordon action can be viewed as a contraction over the spacetime argument of the two scalar/spinor fields in the sense of contravariant/covariant index contraction. 🧵

#physics #theoreticalphysics

Last updated 2 years ago

scandrof · @scandrof
199 followers · 2087 posts · Server aus.social

"After losing his beloved father when he was 10, Ronald Mallett read HG Wells and Einstein. They inspired his eminent career as a theoretical physicist – and his lifelong ambition to build a time machine."

Back to the father: the scientist who lost his dad – and resolved to travel to 1955 to save him | | The Guardian theguardian.com/science/2023/m

#science #timetravel #physics #theoreticalphysics

Last updated 2 years ago

Mike Smith · @selfawarepatterns
188 followers · 664 posts · Server universeodon.com

Is the question whether spacetime is real, or whether it's fundamental?

A blog post commenting on Matt O'Dowd's description of the developing doubt among physicists about whether spacetime is "real" or "fundamental".

selfawarepatterns.com/2023/02/

#physics #philosophofscience #philosophy #theoreticalphysics

Last updated 2 years ago

Keiren Mitchell · @keirenmitchell
75 followers · 113 posts · Server mastodonapp.uk

”The most ordinary things are to philosophy a source of insoluble puzzles. With infinite ingenuity it constructs a concept of space or time and then finds it absolutely impossible that there be objects in this space or that processes occur during this time... the source of this kind of logic lies in excessive confidence in the so-called laws of thought.”

—Ludwig Boltzmann, Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems (1844-1906)

#philosophy #theoreticalphysics #ludwigboltzmann

Last updated 2 years ago

Mike Smith · @selfawarepatterns
174 followers · 590 posts · Server universeodon.com

Interesting unpacking from Hossenfelder on the issues she has with particle physics.

But I'm not sure she herself is immune from the motivational issues she cites. For example, are her reasons for preferring hidden variable theories in QM really any different from the ones she's criticizing here?

To be fair, I doubt anyone really avoids these issues. Testing matters! And which tests to fund seems inevitably a judgment call.

youtube.com/watch?v=lu4mH3Hmw2

#physics #theoreticalphysics #particlephysics #quantum #quantumfoundations

Last updated 2 years ago

The Geoff · @_thegeoff
366 followers · 1376 posts · Server mastodon.social


A little analogy: when antimatter was first suggested as a mathematical prediction (specifically the positron, a POSItive elecTRON) there was some discussion over whether it was a new particle, or just an *absence* of an electron in a field that was all electrons. A "hole" where an electron should be?
For example, is this an absence of a cat, or is it a negative cat?

#cats #duvets #theoreticalphysics #historyofphysics

Last updated 2 years ago

Mark Hughes · @markhughes
505 followers · 4694 posts · Server mastodon.social
Dom · @freeDomForTooting
47 followers · 127 posts · Server qoto.org

have just published the results of a project that Renato Assante, Davide Marenduzzo, Alexander Morozov, and I recently worked on together! What did we do and what’s new? Briefly…

suspensions behave in a similar way to fluids containing kinesin and microtubules. Both systems can be described by the same system of three coupled nonlinear .

A of these equations suggests that variations in concentration across the system don’t significantly affect emergent . How then can we explain that show visible inhomogeneities in mixtures, for instance?

With increasing activity, we move away from the quiescent regime, past the onset of , and deeper into the active phase, where become more important. What role do concentration inhomogeneities play here?

We investigated these questions, taking advantage of the framework to simulate the full nonlinear time evolution. This led us to predict a regime of into active (nematically ordered) and passive domains.

Active flow arrests macrophase separation in this regime, counteracting domain coarsening due to thermodynamic coupling between active matter concentration and order. As a result, domains reach a characteristic size that decreases with increasing activity.

This regime is one part of the we mapped out. Along with our other findings, you can read all about it here!

low

#microswimmer #opensource #Dedalus #spectral #novel #spontaneous #microphaseSeparation #nematic #phasediagram #reynoldsnumber #turbulence #ActiveTurbulence #theoreticalphysics #biophysics #science #research #ActiveGel #cytoskeleton #mpi #BerisEdwards #computationalPhysics #simulation #softmatter #PDEs #LinearStabilityAnalysis #phaseBehaviour #experiments #microtubule #kinesin #SpontaneousFlow #nonlinearities #CahnHilliard #activematter #navierstokes #condensedmatter #phasetransitions #statisticalphysics #fluiddynamics #fieldtheory #PaperThread #newpaper #activeNematic #analytic #hydrodynamics #theory

Last updated 2 years ago

Dom · @freeDomForTooting
44 followers · 125 posts · Server qoto.org

have just published the results of a project that Renato Assante, Davide Marenduzzo, Alexander Morozov, and I recently worked on together! What did we do and what’s new? Briefly…

The behaviour of inhomogeneous gels (such as extensile bundles of filaments or suspensions of low swimmers) can be described by the time evolution of three coupled .

Standard concludes, from a of these equations, that fluctuations in concentration don’t significantly affect emergent . However, this leaves of visible inhomogeneities in mixtures unexplained. As we move away from the passive (quiescent) regime, past the onset of , and deeper into the active phase, become more important. What role do concentration inhomogeneities play here?

Alongside techniques, we used an in-house -parallel code developed within the framework to investigate. We predict a regime of into active (nematically ordered) and passive domains. In this regime, active flow arrests macrophase separation, which is itself driven by the thermodynamic coupling between active matter concentration and order. As a result, domains do not past a typical size, which decreases with increasing activity. This regime is one part of the we mapped out.

Along with our other findings, you can read all about it here!

#softmatter #activeNematic #cytoskeletal #reynoldsnumber #phaseBehaviour #experimental #microtubule #navierstokes #BerisEdwards #condensedmatter #phasetransitions #theoreticalphysics #research #PDEs #LinearStabilityAnalysis #spectral #novel #spontaneous #microphaseSeparation #nematic #coarsen #phasediagram #CahnHilliard #activematter #biophysics #statisticalphysics #fluiddynamics #computationalPhysics #simulation #fieldtheory #PaperThread #newpaper #science #hydrodynamic #ActiveGel #theory #observations #kinesin #SpontaneousFlow #nonlinearities #analytic #mpi #Dedalus

Last updated 2 years ago

DavidL · @davidlrtb
0 followers · 43 posts · Server social.tchncs.de

@empiricism That was my answer. It may be interesting to ask: "Physicists, what to you think is at the very end of the world, and what's beyond! Please speculate!"

My own answer may be very different.

#theoreticalphysics

Last updated 2 years ago

DavidL · @davidlrtb
0 followers · 43 posts · Server social.tchncs.de

@empiricism Ok, that's a lot of aspects. Yes, my sphere is a "thought experiment". But my sphere exists theoretically (in some odd definition of "now"). However, the rocket will not reach the "crest", the "border" or whatever you may name it in my though experiment, says .
In contrast, for your thought experiment says nothing because of the single "faster than light" proposition.

#theoreticalphysics

Last updated 2 years ago

Gary · @empiricism
286 followers · 1559 posts · Server qoto.org

@davidlrtb

"You are absolutely right! "

What? Then I definitely made an error somewhere.

"Sadly, no answer will be given.......Neither that you should not study physics and get proficient in ."

I have listened to many theoretical physicists discuss the subject (True). Plus I watched a Youtube video about it - so I now consider myself a world expert (another joke)

In science, it's OK to say "we don't know that! (yet?)"

However, it's not correct, and often hubris to say "we will never know that!". Some folks say "we will never know that!" as a form of pseudo-intellect-signaling - to suggest that they know, that we will never know that (and they don't know!). Basically, the same as OMG.

Ironically, psychology can also help in the study of theoretical physics.

#theoreticalphysics

Last updated 2 years ago

DavidL · @davidlrtb
0 followers · 43 posts · Server social.tchncs.de

@empiricism You are absolutely right!

And because of all of your arguments, the thought experiment is out of scope of and .

That means: even if your question is very interesting you can not find any answer in the realm of . It's not that I'm not willing to give an answer. Neither that you should not study physics and get proficient in . Sadly, no answer will be given.

#physics #theoreticalphysics

Last updated 2 years ago