Jim₿eLogic.Hodl 🔑 · @JimBLogic
70 followers · 647 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org

This is the way 💪⚡
Opening a channel as I send this tweet.
---
RT @SwissRouting
Brand new node up and running!

Using (@Core_LN) with for optimal routing (thanks to @renepickhardt).

Feel free to open a channel to me: amboss.space/node/0279f06eba0e
twitter.com/SwissRouting/statu

#CoreLightning #lightningnetwork #bitcoin #zeroBaseFee

Last updated 2 years ago

openoms · @openoms
1129 followers · 4036 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org

RT @rusty_twit
Fact of the Day: In v0.11.0 and above, you can turn on for all channels using `setchannel feebase=0`, and add `fee-base=0` to your config for future channels. (Add `clboss-zerobasefee=require` if you use clboss 0.11D and above).

#zeroBaseFee #cln

Last updated 2 years ago

George Saoulidis · @glowleaf
89 followers · 32884 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org

RT @renepickhardt
Since the proposal I started questioning the following more heavily:

Who *decides* what is and what it looks like?

Obviously we had changes to in the past but as there is no central authority by design they must somehow emerge / be agreed upon?!

#bitcoin #zeroBaseFee

Last updated 2 years ago

openoms · @openoms
1129 followers · 4036 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org

RT @renepickhardt
Hell (fucking) Yeah!!1!

Finally sub second runtime (0.65 sec) to compute a reasonable payment flow on the entire(!) !

Guess it's time for

Thx y'all for your support & trust!

fyi @roasbeef @TheBlueMatt @Snyke @realtbast @BitMEX @stefanwouldgo

#zeroBaseFee #lightningnetwork

Last updated 3 years ago

Dave Jones · @sobr
345 followers · 2325 posts · Server noagendasocial.com

@praetorrian @Peaceandprosperity @adam There are a lot of nodes that are doing now. Podcast Index's node has zero fee channels with some other nodes we trust.

The issue you run into is that the lightning routing algo will always prioritize lowest fees. So, as soon as you drop to zero on a certain channel, the whole world wants to use you for routing and it drains your liquidity fast.

#zeroBaseFee

Last updated 3 years ago

Satoshis Stream · @satoshisstream
100 followers · 489 posts · Server podcastindex.social

@adam and @dave could you set for your nodes? Now all (podcasting) transactions cost 1 sat to start with.

Wherever I have liq I set base fee to 0 so micropayments flow better 😉

#zeroBaseFee

Last updated 3 years ago

Anita Posch · @anita
346 followers · 2810 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org
openoms · @openoms
1130 followers · 4036 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org

The concern remains with :
to never route free (not even the 1 msat shards) the minimum feerate setting would be 1 000 000 ppm which is a 100% fee.
If it is not applied a payer with free CPU and and disk IO capacity would be incentivised to flood with msats.

#zeroBaseFee

Last updated 3 years ago

openoms · @openoms
1130 followers · 4036 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org

Correction:
Watch the "msat" in the OP.
The "rounding down" only applies to the sub-millisat earnings. HTLC and routing fees are accounted in msats.
This means with at 100 ppm routing 9 sats (or 9999 msats) would be free.
At 1 ppm this would be 999 sats.

#zeroBaseFee

Last updated 3 years ago

openoms · @openoms
1130 followers · 4036 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org

@harding Yes, unfortunately the base fee is the floor, the presence of which does not work with their calculations.
As a payer it would be better to get rid of a variable, but I felt extremely annoyed by seeing hundreds of 0 fee forwards through my node today, hours after dropping the base fee.
incentivises every payer to break up the amounts to many small pieces.

#zeroBaseFee

Last updated 3 years ago

openoms · @openoms
1130 followers · 4036 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org

The research is great but after seeing this action made my mind up quickly: twitter.com/openoms/status/141
A simpler model at the cost of routing incentives does not worth it.
---
RT @openoms
If you have and 100 ppm feerate still routing 9999 sat payments for free.
Where you would count on 100ppm your node charges nothing for 100*9999.
With 1 sat basefee you would get exactly 100 sats both when rout…
twitter.com/openoms/status/141

#zeroBaseFee

Last updated 3 years ago

openoms · @openoms
1130 followers · 4036 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org

If you have and 100 ppm feerate still routing 9999 sat payments for free.
Where you would count on 100ppm your node charges nothing for 100*9999.
With 1 sat basefee you would get exactly 100 sats both when routing 1*999900 or 100*9999.

---
RT @alexbosworth
LN routing policy rounds down percentage fees and the lowest ppm is 1, so sometimes you can get totally free routing just by using multi-pat…
twitter.com/alexbosworth/statu

#lightning #RunTheNumbers #zeroBaseFee

Last updated 3 years ago

openoms · @openoms
1130 followers · 4036 posts · Server bitcoinhackers.org

Congrats for this @renepickhardt and @stefanwouldgo and thank you for publishing for all our benefit!
I am aboard the ship.
Make ⚡ pathfinding easier and optimise for more successful payments!
---
RT @renepickhardt
Optimally Reliable & Cheap Payment Flows on the Lightning Network

the joint work with @stefanwouldgo is now (as promised) in the : arxiv.org/abs/2107.05322

This method should allow us to
⚡️ se…
twitter.com/renepickhardt/stat

#open #zeroBaseFee

Last updated 3 years ago